• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 hours ago

    You absolutely 🎶diiiiiiiiiiiiiid🎶 and you are humiliating yourself here.

    (Hey so I’m gonna go do something more interesting than listen to you recite the narcissist’s prayer, I’ll get back to your next limp accusation of “perverted debate behavior” or not making a point or w/e in a while mmk? mmk.)

    (Bye for now!)

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        55 minutes ago

        You’re still… doing this? You lied, dude. You knowingly presented a source to support your claim as being public, when it isn’t, and even better you’d never even seen the data. That’s just lying, there’s no way to whine or insult your way out of it. You, are a liar.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          It is available to the public, though. Here’s Arnaud Bertrand talking about it. I’ve seen the data. I am not a liar, you seemed to have an extremely particular definition of publicly available and derailed the conversation on those ground alone. Very strange.

          • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            30 minutes ago

            Dear god, a twitter link? How quaint, musk must be so proud.

            Do… you ever actually read your sources?

            It had to be given to the author of that thread by the lead researcher, it isn’t available to the public.