In the immediate aftermath of the attack on the White House Correspondents’ Dinner on Saturday night, influencers, pundits, and random posters lit up social media platforms like X, Bluesky, and Instagram with conspiracy theories about the attack and the alleged shooter.
Both left- and right-wing accounts claimed, without evidence, that the attack was staged.
President Donald Trump, Vice President JD Vance, and dozens of other high-profile administration officials and journalists were attending the dinner at the Hilton hotel in Washington, DC, when a suspect, later identified by media reports as Cole Tomas Allen from California, allegedly ran past security towards the event. He was detained by law enforcement while the president and vice president were evacuated. Police said they believe Cole acted alone, but did not expand on who his intended target was or what his motive may have been. “We believe the suspect was targeting administration officials,” acting attorney general Todd Blanche told NBC’s Meet the Press on Sunday morning.
On Bluesky, which has a predominantly left-leaning user base, many people simply wrote the word “STAGED” over and over again, echoing the response to the Trump assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, in 2024.
On X, many claimed the shooting was staged as a way to bolster support for Trump’s plan to build a new ballroom in the White House. The president referenced the ballroom in a press conference after the incident and a Truth Social post on Sunday morning. Many prominent online Trump boosters echoed the need for the ballroom, including far-right podcaster Jack Posobiec, Libs of TikTok creator Chaya Raichik, and Tom Fitton, the right-wing activist who runs Judicial Watch.
Their quick response, conspiracy theorists claimed, was evidence of a coordinated campaign following the shooting. “Is this another staged event,” one X user asked in a post that has been viewed more than 5 million times.
Other social media users who claimed the incident was staged pointed to a Fox News clip that featured the station’s White House correspondent Aishah Hasnie speaking from the Hilton hotel. Hasnie told viewers that prior to the shooting, press secretary Karoline Leavitt’s husband allegedly told her, “You need to be very safe,” before the call was cut off.
“Fox News just cut one of their reporters off as they seemed to indicate the shooting was a preplanned false flag,” one X user wrote in a post that has been viewed more than 2 million times. Hasnie later clarified in an X post that her cell service had cut out in a location with notoriously bad service, adding: “He was telling me to be careful with my own safety because the world is crazy. He was expressing his concern for my safety.”
“I don’t want to be fomenting conspiracies,” wrote Angelo Carusone, the chair and president of Media Matters, on Bluesky about the Fox News interview. “But I mean … this was super weird. Super weird.”
Leavitt herself was also the focus of conspiracy theories after she said “shots will be fired” in an interview ahead of the dinner, referring to the jokes Trump was scheduled to deliver. Following the attack, X users claimed the comment was “strange,” “sus,” or a “curious choice of words,” while sharing memes that suggested the shooting was staged. At least one mainstream outlet appeared to amplify the conspiracy theory as well, describing Leavitt’s comment as “eerie” and “bizarre.”
“A lot of people are saying they think the WHCD shooting was staged, as a way to change the narrative from his abysmal approval ratings and his bumbling of the Iran War,” Majid Padellan, a progressive social media influencer known online as Brooklyn Dad, posted on X to his 1.3 million followers. “What do YOU think? Staged or not staged?” A debate ensued in his comment section, with many followers claiming it was indeed staged.
There were also some right-wing figures raising the possibility that the attack was staged. “Was this staged,” Sam Parker, a self-described America First nationalist with a large online following wrote on X, referencing Leavitt’s comments and footage of Erika Kirk leaving the event in tears.
These conspiracy theories have continued to spread without evidence. Nothing new has been uncovered about the alleged shooter’s motivation, and conspiracy theories around incidents tend to evolve rapidly in the days and weeks following the event. Opinions are still being formed: Far-right conspiracy theorist Alex Jones, for example, went from questioning whether Saturday night’s incident was staged to saying it wasn’t in the space of a couple of hours.
Former congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, another noted conspiracy theorist, hasn’t appeared to have made up her mind. “Many questions about Cole Allen,” she wrote on X on Saturday night. “People researched quickly and found some interesting things.”
I’m all in with my tin foil hat on. This just stinks of a poorly staged propaganda event. Why was he even there? He hates that event. That security was ridiculous, the guy did a 100 yard dash right past everyone who were just standing around socializing. Trump immediately brought up his bunker/ballroom in the press conference. He’s running out of time to get that built by January 2029.
Why was he even there? He hates that event.
He hated the event before the purge and now it’s full of assholes like Dana White.
It’s not a conspiracy theory if it’s true.
It’s almost like undermining and destroying journalism replaced with 24/7 infotainment corpo propaganda garbage boosting conspiracies over well sourced facts leaves you with a bunch of people who don’t read primary sources and don’t trust the news media networks owned by billionaires and corpo shareholders. Where’s my leopards.
I don’t generally consume conspiracy-related content beyond documented history and sensationalized entertainment.
That said, it’s relevant in a historical context that now, around half-a-dozen times, there have been significant security failures or breaches around this president leading to several near-miss assassination attempts. This is anomalous and doesn’t really happen, because generally, the layers of security around a public presidential appearance are so strict it’s essentially impossible to pull something like this off.
Couple that with the documented fact that Donald views his administration as if it is a reality show, even picking top administration officials in part on how they look are able to speak in front of a camera.
Those two facts, put together, make me think that it’s not out of the question that these various assassination attempts are either staged or tacitly allowed and externally controlled.
It could also just be the fact that only the most corrupt incompetent shitheads are willing to work for the prick so his security is ass.
You’re not wrong. That’s a sensible explanation too.
I don’t think any of them were staged, but this seems much more likely than the others. The fact that this was the only Correspondence Dinner he attended, the generally muted reactions from most of the administration…it seems like them allowing this shootee to get as far as he did seems very possible. The fact that they seemed so pleased with themselves afterwards at least says that they see this as a big opportunity.
I think that’s a pretty big misread though. Outside of MAGA diehards and pearl clutching media elites, the reactions I’ve been seeing online vary from, “it’s fake,” to, “who gives a shit?” They’re not going to be able to capitalize on this the same way they did in 2024.
Strange that they say that now.
The first one with the ear and photo op was much more obvious and largely believed by both their silly sides.Wouldn’t surprise me either way tbh. He’s a historically unpopular president who’s daily doing things that are getting people killed or making their lives harder, a lot of people probably do want to off him. On the other hand, staging another assassination attempt is exactly the kind of crude showmanship he would go for and that will probably work on his base.
After the very obviously-staged Doordash stunt, I don’t blame people for thinking this was a stunt too. Frankly, that seems more likely than not at this point.
It possibly won him the election last time. If I were him I’d do it again.
Rigging the election won it last time.
Yeah, I say that too, but I don’t know that.
He staged all of his assassination attempts. Every single one. Dude wants to seem invincible to his base and rally them to think leftists are violent. That way he can pass laws that attack ideologies, like being anti fascist, or a socialist, or generally anything left leaning.
I still don’t buy the story that his ear got shot and magically healed all the way up to look normal again. Saw a joke about it that was something like “He only needs 2 more fake assassination attempts to earn a free sub at Quizno’s”
I don’t have an opinion either way about possible staged attempts, but if they were trying to make leftists look violent, why would they have used MAGA people for the first two attempts?
My suspicion is they just pick up data that a real person is considering an attempt, and then allow the least risky ones to get closest to success. Their base will cast whoever tries anything as a leftist regardless of the reality, or conveniently forget they’re right-wing, but it’s not really about making left-wing people look violent. It’s about dominating the media airtime and controlling people’s attention. It’s the same tactic Trump successfully uses on social media or on TV - throw a bunch of shit out there and let the media pick at it while doing the actually heinous shit.
There’s just no other reason that it makes sense for this event to have no security, 2 months after someone with a shotgun and gas can went into mar-a-lago.
Outside at some town in Flyover, PA? Makes sense.
A guy just waltzes into the Correspondent’s Dinner with a gun? No way.
Trump engaged in a conspiracy to overturn the election in 2020 and very nearly succeeded in murdering congresspeople, so there’s nothing particularly irrational about entertaining the thought that it’s a conspiracy. A lot of news outlets are ignoring this fact, possibly due to the conspiracy taking place right now at the DOJ.
Those damn billionaire owned news outlets.
The main thing that makes me think it’s real is how boring the manifesto is - why write a nothingburger?
Both left- and right-wing accounts claimed, without evidence, that the attack was staged.
Weird, news outlets everywhere claim it’s legitimate.
odd, ain’t it?
Can the billionaire-owned news outlets win in trying to convince us that what’s up, is down and what isn’t, is? Stay tuned…
…Thiel wrote to Yarvin in 2014. “One reassuring thought: one of our hidden advantages is that these people”—social-justice warriors—“wouldn’t believe in a conspiracy if it hit them over the head (this is perhaps the best measure of the decline of the Left). Linkages make them sound really crazy, and they kinda know it.”
(this is perhaps the best measure of the decline of the Left).
Huh? How the fuck does this make any sense? The left being wary of conspiracy theories is the best measure of its decline? What?
Perhaps the worst thing about all of this, is having to read the shit these idiotic psychopaths write. They think they sound smart or something, but it’s always borderline meaningless
They probably mean that liberals (which they mix up with leftists) are self-conscious pushing conspiracy theories, but I’d argue that’s not true at all
I’m so happy I live in a world where these fucking idiots at legacy media can’t put simple cause and effect together. They’ve relied on propagandizing through mass media and people don’t know where to turn for reasonable information and now we have this type shit.
If it’s not staged in the sense they plan it outright, than i think they are using algorithms to convince people to do this shit. That’s basically what gangstalking is…
I wouldn’t be surprised if they have a psychological profile of potential assassins and can data mine to find candidates.
Palantir beta testing.
“Tear up Texas!”
