• Telorand@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Also tbh, if it does the same things as before, they could call it POOP, and I’d still use it. The name has no bearing on how it functions.

    Who is really out here getting bent out of shape over a name?

    • Hawke@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Also tbh, if it does the same things as before, they could call it POOP, and I’d still use it. The name has no bearing on how it functions.

      That sounds like an argument against the name change…

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No, I vote they change it to be just an unpronounceable symbol. You know, kind of like the artist formerly known as Prince.

        It’s a lot harder to complain about a name change if it’s not a name!

    • NotSteve_@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Software needs users to fund development and most users find the software via word of mouth and there’s no way I’m telling a friend that they should try POOP for their next art project

      • Telorand@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Nope, but it’s a nicer way to say, “Y’all are fucking stupid for caring this much about a name change for software that’s free.”

        I’d rather let people read between the lines on their own!