cross-posted from: https://hexbear.net/post/7760707

“Death to Germany because they say their reason for existing is to support ‘Israel’[1]? That’s genocidal against Germans.”

Sorry, but I don’t care about your colonizer fragility.

amerikkka germany-cool eu-cool isntrael qin-shi-huangdi-fireball


  1. Not a joke, they call this “Staatsräson”. ↩︎

  • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 days ago

    Mocking left-wing nationalists since it doesn’t solve anything for those actually being oppressed (3rd world proletariat) and just promotes “blood and soil” type shit

      • derAbsender@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        As a Motor for liberation.

        Nationalism must be abandoned and the national Elite is not allowed to be formed, be it bureaucratic or capitalist.

        Otherwise it is just a vehicle from one oppression to the next.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nationalism as a reaction to imperialism and colonialism is progressive, and aids the liberatory movement. Nationalism in the context of an imperialist country solidifies imperialism. Nationalism is not something that exists in the abstract, but instead is highly contextual.

          • derAbsender@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            Yes and therefore after the national liberation was achieved the context of Nationalism Changes drastically

          • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            i think i’d clarify that there’s a difference between having a national identity and organizing a state around national supremacism. i want to live in a place where i am allowed to be Appalachian. i do not want to live in a place where Appalachian is a state promoted identity and other identities are excluded

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              There’s also a difference between the kinds of progressive nationalist movements like Algeria in kicking out the French, and creating a national supremacist state.

    • LeninWeave [they]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      I’m still not sure I understand. Are you saying that it doesn’t help the third world proletariat for stolen land to be returned to them and for them to have self-determination? Would it not help Palestinians to have their land returned and have control of their own nation?

      • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 day ago

        No it doesn’t help the proletariat, it only changes who the oppressor is and arguably only makes it easier and cheaper in the long run for foreign imperial powers to economically exploit them.

        This article honestly sums it up better than I ever could and isn’t too long, I’d recommend giving it a read.

        Also, national liberation would simply not work in Palestine - after all, do you really believe that if Palestinians came out furiously waving their flags one morning, it’d make Israel (which is another national liberation state btw) feel bad and stop their genocide and settling?

        • MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          national liberation would simply not work in Palestine

          Congratulations you have the same take as the corrupt as fuck Palestinian authority

          what do you propose that we give up and just let ourselves be killed to the point of extermination ??

          • LeninWeave [they]@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            I’m sorry you had to see this kind of garbage comment. Embarrassing that we have “leftists” willing to say things like this.

            • MohammedTheCommunistPalestinian [he/him]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Thank you comrade

              I genuinely wonder where people like this come from cause it’s like they were designed in lab specifically to piss you off

              I am not talking about opposing China or Vietnam because for years most western communists opposed china and Maoists in China do oppose pretty much every country in the world including countries like Cuba

              I am specifically referring to them sayings Israel is a “national liberation” state ??? and the nonsensical implication that the Palestinian Proletariat should unite wit the Israeli proletariat to overthrow their perspective bourgeoisie

              not a single communist in either Palestine or Israel would tell you this because it’s dumb

              it’s the equivalent of telling Black people during the civil rights protests that they shouldn’t fight against segregation and instead should unite with the white working class

              • LeninWeave [they]@lemmy.mlOP
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                7
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 day ago

                I genuinely wonder where people like this come from cause it’s like they were designed in lab specifically to piss you off

                lmao, I feel this way about them all the time too. It’s baffling the takes people come up with sometimes.

                I am specifically referring to them sayings Israel is a “national liberation” state ??? and the nonsensical implication that the Palestinian Proletariat should unite wit the Israeli proletariat to overthrow their perspective bourgeoisie

                not a single communist in either Palestine or Israel would tell you this because it’s dumb

                Yes, this notion died a hard and final death for obvious reasons when the communist party of “Israel” split over it, right?

                it’s the equivalent of telling Black people during the civil rights protests that they shouldn’t fight against segregation and instead should unite with the white working class

                TBH people are still having this kind of take today. It’s all just chauvinism of all kinds disguised as “leftism”, I think.

                  • LeninWeave [they]@lemmy.mlOP
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    7
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 day ago

                    I meant that people still have chauvinistic “this BLM stuff is distracting us from class struggle” types of takes even recently. They do it with all kinds of issues, I think it’s just class reductionism basically.

              • Commiunism@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                I am specifically referring to them sayings Israel is a “national liberation” state ??? and the nonsensical implication that the Palestinian Proletariat should unite wit the Israeli proletariat to overthrow their perspective bourgeoisie

                How fucking hard is it for a communist (basis of which is in “workers have no nation”, emancipation of international proletariat, abolishment of commodity production + markets + wage labor, etc and thus imperialism that necessitates its upkeep, and the abolishment of bourgeois state) to side with the international proletariat rather than a bourgeois state/movement to establish a bourgeois state?

                it’s the equivalent of telling Black people during the civil rights protests that they shouldn’t fight against segregation and instead should unite with the white working class

                And how did that turn out? Racial discrimination has been abolished, right?

                Also if it makes things better for you, ML’s do piss me off too.

                • lmao fake Marxist

                  supporting segregation ??? pfft

                  Israeli communists do side with Palestinian ones (Do you really think in whaat is like 80 years that no has thought of that ??? seriously ???

                  too bad Most other Israelis are literally fascists who want to commit genocide

                  and for your information there is a Palestinian bourgeoisie and they support working with Israel to create “peace”

                  there’s pretty much zero way for a communist state to be created here without a Palestinian state being established first

                  Racial discrimination has been abolished, right?

                  it can’t be abolished

                  yes if classes were abolished it would definitely be much less but it’d still exist

                  How fucking hard is it for a communist (basis of which is in “workers have no nation”, emancipation of international proletariat, abolishment of commodity production + markets + wage labor, etc and thus imperialism that necessitates its upkeep, and the abolishment of bourgeois state) to side with the international proletariat rather than a bourgeois state/movement to establish a bourgeois state?

                  Lenin supported the Irish uprising of 1916

                • LeninWeave [they]@lemmy.mlOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  20 hours ago
                  1. Locate your avatar in the top right of the screen and select “Settings”

                  Screenshot of step 1.

                  1. Select “Delete Account”

                  Screenshot of step 2.

                  1. Enter your password and select “Delete”

                  Screenshot of step 3.

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      Mocking left-wing nationalists since it doesn’t solve anything for those actually being oppressed (3rd world proletariat)

      So did the revolutions in Vietnam, or cuba, or north korea, or burkina faso, etc. not help the proletariat and just lead to “blood and soil type shit.” All of those involved colonized people taking back their land and involved elements of nationalism.

      Can you name a time this happened?

    • The Quuuuuill@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      how? the people of the global south to my experiece see their role in the world to act as responsible parties to the land they are indigenous to. the people of the global north, be they 1st world or 2nd world, have invaded this land, don’t respect its laws, and have claimed it as their own. this is what is meant by stolen land. it’s not a blood and soil thing where the land belongs to the people via bloodright. it’s more accurate to say the people belong to the land, be that indigenous american relationships to turtle island or the concept in palestinian teaching that they are seeds.

      i’m ready adjust my stance, but your notion that landback movements to return people to their stolen land and allow them to manage their society based on their relationship to the land being anti-left, or even fascist, strikes me as very odd at best, and possibly paternalistic at worst