• some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Who’s saying to “put the world on welfare”? This conversation isn’t about getting things for free from the government, it’s about who is able to enter the country. It is proven thus far that immigration into the US is a net benefit, they commit fewer crimes than citizens and earn their way.

    Edit: “preying on the generosity of our country” is hilarious

    • Abundance114@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      The initial premis of the argument that I replied to was questioning why people who were born in the U.S. are entitled to something that those who are not born in the U.S. are not.

      I’m all for net tax payers entering the U.S. through legal routes. Methods that protect the immigrant from exploitation from employers.

      • some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        Thanks for clarifying.

        Immigrating to the US legally in 2026 is a slow, restrictive, and broken process. Opening it up wouldn’t be the end of the world.

        • Abundance114@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I would love reform. Any changes that get smart productive people into the U.S. would only help us.

          At the same time dont you feel it harms foreign countries? We’re literally brain draining other countries keeping them in poverty or preventing them from developing.

            • Abundance114@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              So you’re okay with immigration that builds up our society despite it harming the immigrants home country?

              • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                20 hours ago

                Hmm, maybe you have a point. Oh wait, I know of something that would help reduce those harmful effects!

                Open borders

                  • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    17 hours ago

                    That’s just like, openly, demonstrably false. Poor countries greatly benefit from having open borders to wealthier nations, as it removes barriers to bringing that wealth back into those poor countries. Closed borders only serve to keep rich countries rich, and poor countries poor.

                    Next to no one is fleeing to Mexico for economic opportunity.

                    You framing it as "fleeing"really drives home your biases. If there were an open border between the US and Mexico, we’d see two-way movement way more often, as it’d be way easier for Mexicans to come to the US seeking economic opportunity, build some wealth, then take that back across the open border to Mexico to their family/dependents/community. We see that pretty much everywhere there’s an open border or some sort of economic cooperation zone.