• MyMindIsLikeAnOcean@piefed.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 hours ago

    In your situation the cost was likely built in and your were paying more than it cost. If you ever exceeded the cost, your agreement would have changed.

    Your situation is increasingly less common…it’s basically a legacy thing where landlords don’t have separate meters for their tenants.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Was going to say- I’ve always had to open my own account with the water company to provide water to my apartment. Definitely not folded in.

    • agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      I don’t think they had any meters on individual units, they had no way of knowing who was using what, so no basis to change the agreement. I’m not saying it’s common, I’m just saying it’s a situation that exists.

      • MNByChoice@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 hours ago

        they had no way of knowing who was using what

        I think u/MyMindIsLikeAnOcean’s point was that the landlord would change things if the cost got high enough. For example, water usage of $10K per month would prompt the landlord to get those meters added.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          19 hours ago

          For example, water usage of $10K per month would prompt the landlord to get those meters added.

          Our more likely, raise everyone’s rent to cover the excessive water use.