• Pearl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    9 hours ago

    As much as I love google hate, the bigger problem is people thinking work devices are private. They are not. Your messages/thoughts/ideas belong to the organization.

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yeah this is the bigger issue here really. Fuck Google and their invasive bullshit, absolutely, but work devices should never be used for personal/private use, and vice versa. Keep that shit completely separate as much as possible.

    • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Yup! Just cuz your employer isn’t physically there looking over your shoulder while using the device doesn’t mean they are oblivious to what you are doing on it.

      • sidebro@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        9 hours ago

        And they pay for it, so it’s completely fine for them to track it, in my opinion. Use private phones, people.

        • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          8 hours ago

          You would be mistaken if you think that every work phone is paid for by the employer. A lot of companies have a BYOD policy and still require loading their restrictive bullshit onto it. I have worked at two places like this and I refused to let them do it, but most went along with it. The funniest part if that they still wanted me on the on call rotation, but wouldn’t pay for a decent device so they dug out an ancient Nextel phone for me to use. I have no idea how it still worked.

          • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Good! That’s exactly how you should react to that request. BYOD is only okay if the company is subsidizing your monthly bill, even then it’s a grey area to me.

            • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Yeah, I had no choice on needing a phone for bring on call, but being only able to receive calls or SMS really cut down on the nonsense heh.

          • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            8 hours ago

            In fairness, that is a different situation than this.

            This is google basically providing a mechanism for employers and parents to pull text messages on devices on their plans. That wouldn’t impact BYOD as that is still not on their plan.

            But all the management software and spyware already have those capabilities. Which… is the other aspect of this karma-bate post.

            • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              7 hours ago

              Every work phone, BYOD or not, has had the corporate profile stuff installed which already let them see most of everything. I just assumed this was more of the same. Shame on me for not reading the article.

          • sidebro@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            I’ve actually never heard about this where I live, in Sweden. Thanks for sharing, even though it sounds both shitty and pretty scummy.

            • zod000@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 hours ago

              I’m glad to hear that the BYOD trend didn’t take off in every country. Many of the companies would act like they were doing you a favor so you didn’t have the “hassle” of carrying two phones around. Oh that is a hassle, but this was just them shoveling their costs onto the worker.

        • nothx [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Private devices in general. I’ve seen people logged into their social media on company laptops as if the incognito window matters lol.

          • sidebro@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            My old boss logged onto her private investment bank account on the work computers/network and bought and sold stock, for example. God knows what else she did. She got fired for using the company card for private purchases. Good fucking riddance. :D

  • scoutfdt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Suddenly, the perk of being given a phone at work is not as good as it might seem.

    Since when is a work phone a perk. They have horrible battery performance, only function between 9 and 5 and call quality is absolute fuckin shit.

    • monovergent@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      55 minutes ago

      Me over here having to provide my own work phone because BYOD. At least it’s my old phone I upgraded from, so the cost is already sunk.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      A work phone is a perk because it means you don’t have to install Teams, Slack, and a bunch of proprietary nonsense you’ve never heard of onto your personal phone.

    • cenzorrll@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Seriously, the number of tunnels they cut off in as soon as a call comes in is astounding.

  • sunshine@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 hours ago

    how many people would have clicked on this if the title had used the term “on your work phone” like the first sentence of the article does?

  • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 hours ago

    GrapheneOS. Use a work profile. Segregate your work from your personal information. As far as the employer is concerned, they have full control over your device. They can even send a wipe command to it and it would only affect the work partition, leaving your personal data alone.

    My favorite tool for managing this is an app called Shelter. Graphene has robust profiling support, but I don’t want to have to swap in and out of something to see info. Shelter allows you to clone apps from your main profile to your work profile. You don’t even have to set up Google Play Services with an account if you don’t want.

    • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Yeah… having to reprovision a phone because it just got reformatted is going to raise a red flag. And if you are installing a rogue OS on your work phone to prevent your employer from seeing what you are doing… I actually side with them when they fire your ass.


      Your nonsense makes sense if it is a personal device that you are using for work purposes. Which… I strongly oppose for a range of reasons. If your work wants you “on call” then they can provide a device. Otherwise you can never be off call.

        • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Do you really think it’s a good idea to install an unofficial OS on a device your employer owns without their permission?

          • d-RLY?@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            14 minutes ago

            Would be fine if the person is having to BYOD as the phone is already theirs (which is how I took it at least). Obviously flashing a custom ROM of any sort without approval on a device that you don’t own, and would have to give back to the company is a bad idea. The same would apply to installing a different OS on a work PC (which tend to have the BIOS locked to prevent changing things or being able to simply boot an install USB). But I think managed phones with the level of being able to wipe the device remotely would also already be blocking access to developer options. Along with other stuff needed to unlock the needed stuff for flashing other ROMs (though I haven’t flashed a ROM in a while and never had a work phone so I might be wrong).

            But if the company tries to take “ownership” of your personal device that you pay/paid for without providing a company owned device. Then it would be best to try and find a different employer, and/or use an old phone you don’t use or get a low-end/cheap phone while working for them. But only go with that option if they provide a SIM/eSIM for service that they are paying for.

          • ORbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 hour ago

            Again, someone who knows nothing about the OS.

            Inform yourself before making these statements. It’s a more secure, hardened version of the official OS. It is not rooted nor is it displayed to the employer as anything other than Android.

            Stop making uniformed statements.

            • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              Again, someone who knows nothing about the OS.

              This has nothing to do with the way the OS works, and everything to do with corporate policy. This would be against the IT policy at most companies, and circumventing their ability to remotely manage the device could easily get you fired.

                • Ajen@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  29 minutes ago

                  I’m just being realistic. Some companies will fire you over this, at it will be “for cause” so you won’t even be eligible for unemployment. If you can afford to lose your job, you can afford to buy your own phone for personal use. But if you want to take that risk, I won’t stop you.

        • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Ah. So graphene DOES have a system where it takes your entire existing OS, shrinks all the partitions on disk, installs itself around that, AND prevents the monitoring software from reporting that your 512 GB device is now actually a 128 GB one?

          Well color me surprised.

          Or, you know, more likely you end up wiping the existing OS by effectively factory resetting it. And then you ping the management software server saying “I need to reinstall your spyware” which triggers a flag that IT may or may not care about. Similarly, said spyware now wonders why your phone’s storage shrunk so massively and raises another flag.

            • NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Considering I have to deal with these kinds of security concerns on the regular as part of my professional life… kind of.

              But you are just switching to ad hominem because your non sequitor “gimme updoots” response to a thread title is nonsense and you can’t admit that. So… I strongly encourage you to wipe your work phone and install graphene with an isolated partition for google/work android and see what happens.

  • Saapas@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    >Microsoft triggered a viral furor when it revealed a Teams update to tell your company when you’re not at work.

    This is the funniest thing, people mad that Teams tracks if you’re actually doing work lol