But i dont think there is any point in doing that. It would be the same as making arguements against flat earthers, moon landing deniers or anti-vaxxers.
It will just keep going, there will always be another agrument no matter how many you debunk.
Because lying is easier. Always possible to claim it was “secret” or whatever.
And then once in a while something said will be correct, which will be taken as proof that it all was correct.
Pointless to argue with these groups.
Do you literally believe that?
Can you make a cogent counter agreement to any single thing I said in my comment?
yes
for genocide one https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11185-022-09258-5
But i dont think there is any point in doing that. It would be the same as making arguements against flat earthers, moon landing deniers or anti-vaxxers. It will just keep going, there will always be another agrument no matter how many you debunk. Because lying is easier. Always possible to claim it was “secret” or whatever. And then once in a while something said will be correct, which will be taken as proof that it all was correct. Pointless to argue with these groups.
One cogent argument is that everything you said sounds really dumb
Edit: the messages have been edited I don’t remember responding to the above comment unless it was one of the deleted ones
Truly the pinnacle of wit
So you have nothing
“Sounds dumb” more like sounds contradictory to the white supremacist narrative in your brain