But i dont think there is any point in doing that. It would be the same as making arguements against flat earthers, moon landing deniers or anti-vaxxers.
It will just keep going, there will always be another agrument no matter how many you debunk.
Because lying is easier. Always possible to claim it was “secret” or whatever.
And then once in a while something said will be correct, which will be taken as proof that it all was correct.
Pointless to argue with these groups.
yes
for genocide one https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11185-022-09258-5
But i dont think there is any point in doing that. It would be the same as making arguements against flat earthers, moon landing deniers or anti-vaxxers. It will just keep going, there will always be another agrument no matter how many you debunk. Because lying is easier. Always possible to claim it was “secret” or whatever. And then once in a while something said will be correct, which will be taken as proof that it all was correct. Pointless to argue with these groups.