As per fsf only those linux distributions are 100% free:
Dragora
Dyne
Guix
Hyperbola
Parabola
PureOS
Trisquel
Ututo
libreCMC
ProteanOS
Do you agree or no?
I see a lot of people that want to switch from windows to a linux distro or a open os. But from what i see they tend to migrate to another black boxed/closed os.
What is a trully free os that doesnt included any closed code/binary blobs/closed drivers etc.
Just 100% free open code, no traps.
What are the options and what should one go with if they want fully free os that rejects any closed code?
because they ship with closed source software/packages/drivers/firmware/kernel blobs etc.
most linux distros are the same trap that windows locks you into.
Yes.
Oh, come on.
There doesn’t exist much hardware that has fully open firmware enitely on mass market. I’m not talking about GPUs and CPUs but even WiFi dongles . The FSF is pretty hypocritical in that they’re okay with closed firmware which is built into devices themselves, but they’re not okay with firmware that comes as a file. This is nonsense. Also, they forbid distros which give you the ability to install non-free software even if you require it for your work, forbidding even Electron and fonts which have non-free licenses. This is not possible to live with in the modern patent world. And btw blobs not exist anymore in linux code of torvalds repo it was sepearated long time ago
What a bunch of bullshit.
Linux, first of all, is the kernel. Linux is GPL and always free.
And userspace zurück itself is about 90% free.
Of course, you can choose a 100% free os, then make sure you use a free bios and only open hardware CPU and Mainboard and memory! 09 This argument is esoteric. I am an FSF member, but I use Steam on Gentoo.
The idea behind such distro lists is to show how hard it still is to provide a really 100% open source distro.
Let me remind you, what is non free in in most systems:
Stuff most users need!
And what the fuck is I distro locking me in? I can switch my distro between boots without fucking loosing any data or configs, I can choose what to install. I can install stuff from source. How can you even try to compare this with Microsofts property black box?
Because you can not see what the microcode blob does with your CPU? The CPU you can not inspect also? Or the GPU? Or the BIOS?
I agree , I use multiple distros including #guix use nongnu software because I can’t get libre drivers. Not sure where “vendor lock-in” for Linux distribution comes from. FSF is great but I don’t have the resources , time to find all the libre drivers for my systems. I have been using Linux/BSD for decades. Also Linux is just a kernel not the userland which most people think it is.
kernel is not free
it ships with blobs/proprietary crap etc
if it was free gnu-linux libre wouldnt have existed
https://lemmy.world/comment/20605369
The kernel itself does not contain blobs, firmware or microcode. That is loaded after boot if you’ve chosen to do so.
lol i’m sure the average joe who switches from windows to you name what linux distro does this by himself and not the os doing it for him wtf
So, you have an open system with coreboot, and do not use firmware?
You don’t load the microcode patches that makes you CPU safe?
You know that then you should not use any browser with JS or WASM engine? just asking because those exploits are still being used …
I’m responding to this:
That is not true.
Neither are you. And what that has to do with windows users is beyond me.
If you want gnu/herd, you’re free to install and use it. You will have no:
Drawing a hard line in the sand about FOSS is possible, but you must give up many modern conveniences.
Where is there firmware in the Kernel tree?
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/
Explain then why gnu-linux libre kernel exists if linux kernel is totally free?
I don’t know, they seem to scrub everything related to firmware loading and more. A whole while ago, the kernel contained blobs. Those are moved to the Linux firmware project and no longer part of the kernel l.
So, you are the one here claiming stuff. Proof it. Where is the firmware in the kernel tree?
you dont know but yet you talk rubbish
You claimed there are binary firmware blobs in the Kernel tree. And the kernel is not free. That is your claim. Proof it!
I am building my kernel from sources. I am writing Kernel modules. I damn well know what in the kernel is.
So, come on. If this such a critical issue that you will for sure have no issues to proof it.
Have ever tried to learn what exactly their scrips doing of their project please do ,the most worst part they hidding bummer that u are running not secure microcode .I like ideas behind fsf but their paradigm and what they trying to do is useless and not effective anymore we need something new with same ideas
What do you even try to say?