Busywork fills time and can feel productive. I found it a constant temptation as an eng and pm.
I could spend a couple of hours thinking hard about an actual problem that needs solving, orrrrrr I could fuck around with the bug database doing stuff that gets counted by my boss…
And bosses need to be on alert that they aren’t giving out busywork and feeling good that their employees aren’t staring into space/doodling/chatting any more (which is often what thinking looks like).
The whole LLM thing needs to be studied for all of the cognitive dark patterns they are exploiting. It’s like a grift encyclopedia.
From what I understand of out pilot, most of what the users ended up using it for was pregenerating scripts that are effectively “copy > paste > tweak” dozens if not hundreds of times but can’t be automated for one reason or another and then quickly checking the script for errors, as opposed to your pm/eng use cases, but I believe your sentiment holds true.
I don’t use LLMs because I personally do not like them, so I don’t really know where someone might think they fit best inside a workflow. But I can very easily see my self spending half an hour trying to get the perfect result by prompting rather than spend 10 minutes doing it myself because I tend to basically put on blinders once I start a task.
Busywork fills time and can feel productive. I found it a constant temptation as an eng and pm.
I could spend a couple of hours thinking hard about an actual problem that needs solving, orrrrrr I could fuck around with the bug database doing stuff that gets counted by my boss…
And bosses need to be on alert that they aren’t giving out busywork and feeling good that their employees aren’t staring into space/doodling/chatting any more (which is often what thinking looks like).
The whole LLM thing needs to be studied for all of the cognitive dark patterns they are exploiting. It’s like a grift encyclopedia.
Absolutely agree.
From what I understand of out pilot, most of what the users ended up using it for was pregenerating scripts that are effectively “copy > paste > tweak” dozens if not hundreds of times but can’t be automated for one reason or another and then quickly checking the script for errors, as opposed to your pm/eng use cases, but I believe your sentiment holds true.
I don’t use LLMs because I personally do not like them, so I don’t really know where someone might think they fit best inside a workflow. But I can very easily see my self spending half an hour trying to get the perfect result by prompting rather than spend 10 minutes doing it myself because I tend to basically put on blinders once I start a task.