How do you make a great desktop into a fantastic desktop? Easy — chip away at the rough bits, polish the good stuff, and add awesomeness. After 29 years of development, KDE’s got the foundation nailed down. Plasma 6.5 is all about fine-tuning, fresh features, and a making everything smooth and sleek for everyone.

Ready to see what’s new? Let’s dive into Plasma 6.5!

Highlights:

  • Automatic Theme Transitions: Configure when your theme will transition from light to dark and back.
  • Caret Text Navigation: Zoom now swoops in to where you type
  • KRunner Fuzzy Search: Even if you type it wrong, KRunner will find it!
  • melfie@lemy.lol
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Automatic Theme Transitions: Configure when your theme will transition from light to dark and back

    Neurodivergent people when it automatically switches to light mode:

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      happens to me on random websites and it wakes me tf up when i’m surfing just before bed. lol

  • smeg@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    ·
    19 hours ago

    I just moved to Plasma from XFCE and my first thought was wow, this runs fine on old hardware, why have I been suffering through the 2010 experience when I could have had features all this time!?

    • audaxdreik@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Aww, I will always love XFCE and save a place for it in my heart … but I moved to Plasma 2 years ago and haven’t really looked back either >_>

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        18 hours ago

        XFCE is fine, it seems to largely behave and while it doesn’t have any bells and whistles it can do everything it tries to do fine. Gnome on the other hand… everything I wanted it to do required a plugin which had since been broken by a new version. Plasma seems great so far!

          • vandsjov@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            At least Mac has the whole menu bar going for it. I started out on GNOME but the empty bar in the top just bothered me. Then I went XFCE but I kept running into small annoyances, that probably could be fixed somehow but I don’t really have time to fight/tweak my computer. And now I’m on Plasma and so far it just works and the small tweaks I have done were quick.

          • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Including the limitations of options, albeit worse than Apple. I really don’t understand the hubris of that team.

        • audaxdreik@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Agreed. I was actually afraid to modify my KDE desktop for months because of the trauma sustained from just trying to customize Gnome a bit. My configuration is still pretty vanilla, but it’s got enough personal flair to it that it feels uniquely mine and I’m the happiest I’ve been.

      • smeg@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I’ve only been a Linux user for a couple of years though so I’ve got no excuse!

  • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    What a banger release! Last time they focused on bug hunting, this time its about features. This ping pong focused development is very nice.

    • KRunner Fuzzy Search: Not earth shattering, but welcome. I hope there is a way to dynamically force to enable or disable it. Sometimes fuzzy search can be in the way (I know it from other fuzzy search tools). My recommendation is ~ character to toggle the functionality: "~file" to enable fuzzy in example, if its disabled by default. I may even make a suggestion in the issue tracker, but I don’t know what options they integrated into it yet.
  • Obin@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    End of 2025 and still missing a replacement for Khotkeys. Plasma is still great all in all, but after almost two decades on KDE I feel like I’ve outgrown it and tried to switch away a couple times now. Time to stop procrastinating and getting on with writing my own wlroots compositor.

      • Obin@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Sadly no. I know this one and there is a couple of similar applications out there that all work pretty much the same, using a virtual uinput device to do low-level remapping of key to key. You can do macros or chords with these, but that’s not what I’m after, and in any case, I prefer to do remaps and macros like that first on my QMK keyboard directly if possible, then XKb second.

        Khotkey on the other hand could (among other things) remap keys per window. For example you could say that for key presses sent to Firefox (which has no built-in way to redefine hotkeys), make Ctrl-W not close the window but do this thing instead, or use these keys to move between Ctrl-f search results. These remaps would then affect Firefox and only Firefox, while with apps like the one you linked, remaps would always affect the entire system.

        Another feature was freely configurable mouse gestures that can work in any application and do different things in each application.

        The reason we don’t have anything on wayland is that there is no generalized way for third party apps to intercept, modify, redirect or inject key events. Even global-hotkeys are still lacking in support and lackluster and complex in implementation. This is by design and there are good reasons for this, but it leaves the job of implementing this functionality (as so much on wayland) with the compositor, i.e. here Plasma, Kwin or some other module that’s tightly integrated with them.

        • paper_moon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Ahhh I see. Well damn because that functionality does sound pretty useful, sad that its currently broken with Wayland.

    • chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Same. I always try it out and run into some critical bug causing me to abandon it.

      My Linux Mint install with Cinnamon “just works”, so I’ve been sticking with that and hoping Wayland support goes stable soon, because I hate X Server.

    • rozodru@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      19 hours ago

      the only issues I had with KDE when I was recently using it all revolved around the panel. Random crashes with “too much” interaction. Adding widgets for the panel or desktop is still to this day hit or miss. clicking the “get new widget” option is a roll of the dice if it will actually work or not or even find the thing you want. It’s still horrible at loading stuff in there. and installing whatever, again, is a roll of the dice if it will actually do it or not.

      I like KDE, it’s a good and solid DE but man do they really need to focus on fixing the panels and the installation/discovery of widgets. The alternative is using the pling store and that’s just a headache on it’s own.

  • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Am I the only one who thinks it looks ugly? Don’t get me wrong, they are improving it in many ways and it’s going in the right direction, plus a ton of features and customizability, but when I look at Gnome I don’t doubt for a second where I want to be.

    • timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Yep. Ugly, disjointed in appearance, etc. I set up Debian KDE for a family member moving from windows so it fits. I was impressed that KDE came far from what it was but it very much is like a bucket of bolts to me.

      Gnome in contrast is very put together. Yes, has some quirks but appearance wise is very curated IMO.

      • Echolynx@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        I’m fairly new and happened to choose KDE for my own taste, but I would argue GNOME is not “fully” polished as per this post. The nits there may be small or mindless to GNOME diehards, but from a design standpoint, they seem pretty… rough.

    • Domi@lemmy.secnd.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I also think Gnome is much prettier than KDE but KDE is a fully working desktop environment that does not need extensions to get it to a working state so here I am.

      (Although I would not call KDE ugly)

    • Kami@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      They are two opposite styles of UI.

      However, KDE has a fuckton of customization possibilities that I have always been dreaming of in GNOME.

      And I’m saying this as a GNOME guy, absolutely zero fanboyism here.

      • ghost_laptop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Well, that’s kind of the thing, except for a few things I don’t want to customize it that much, when I’ve tried KDE in the past I just customized it a bit and it looked like shit because I didn’t spend that much time into it. I know you can make it look pretty, but I’d rather waste that time learning how to use Hyperland to be honest since it’s way more customizable and offers something else completely. Except for a better KDE Connect integration I don’t think I’m missing anything I would need on Gnome.

      • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t think anyone would think you were a fanboy, just beacuse KDE has ton of configuration and customization. That’s the opposite of GNOME. I always think of GNOME like Apple, who decides what you can and cannot do, what you are allowed to. I used GNOME 2, then Unity, then GNOME 3 all the way from Ubuntu 2008 to what, 2020 (I forget when I switched to different distro for the first time).

    • thingsiplay@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You are not the only one. Its a taste. I personally like the KDE look the most, its beautiful to me. No other desktop environment looks this good.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      A colleague always complains that KDE looks like Windows. She does also get jealous, though, when she sees me using poweruser features.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      kde is pretty enough, it’s not exactly trendy but I feel they’re going the best they could do while keeping information density

  • Uairhahs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I guess KDE remembering your previous monitor layout after temporarily switching to built in only for laptops is still too big an ask. Related merge has work done but is indefinitely closed and shelves. What a shame.

      • Uairhahs@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Wayland, Super+P always just bring up every option except second screen above built in display. Had to write my own bash script to more flexibly handle this instead of the native manager.

  • TechLich@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    And Debian Sid is still stuck on 6.3.6 :(

    Hopefully they figure out the qt update thing and get the new version packaged soon?

  • DiamondOrthodox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    24
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Unfortunately, KDE is quantity over quality. I like the look and feel for the most part, but out of all the mainstream DEs, I’d say it’s the buggiest. GNOME with too many extensions is absolutely less stable, but vanilla KDE is embarrassing for stability, even on Linux Approved hardware.

    • suicidaleggroll@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      I’ve experienced far fewer bugs on KDE 6 than Mint or Cinnamon, and I refuse to use GNOME. What else are you comparing against?

    • muhyb@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If you knew/remember the first days of KDE 5, it was the buggiest DE ever invented at that time. However nowadays I barely even see any bug in KDE, at least for my use cases. And I’m a WM guy who use KDE out of laziness.