• jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Linux doesn’t really have the profit motives that lead to enshittification.

    I guess a bigger entity could try to start charging for… something… Support, maybe, but that seems unlikely to take off.

    • brax@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      15 hours ago

      My biggest concern is the whole “removing powerful features = user friendliness!” mentality that these big tech companies have been pushing for years.

      Why make users smarter when you can make software worse and charge more for it?

      The dummies don’t get the bigger picture, they just see “nobody needs powerful features that make things too confusing for me!” My hope is that they don’t flood Linux with this drivel - profit margin or not, it’s a toxic cultre that has already been created in commercial software.

      • Pika@rekabu.ru
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        There will always be newbie-oriented distros as well as ones for experienced/professional users. It’s alright if the former will go towards simplification, as long as we have plenty more keeping the tinkering spirit.

        Besides, each and every distro has a powerful tool that can help you do everything: the terminal. No one limits you there, and unlike in Windows, terminal is heavily and commonly used.

        • brax@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          And back in the day we had CMD that was pretty powerful. Things are great now but if Linux sees a huge flock of new users, and they become the status quo then we could be in trouble.

          Worst case scenario: widows goes tits-up and everybody flocks to Linux. Solid ground for a potential commerical swing to happen.