alyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM to Gaming@beehaw.orgEnglish · 5 days agoI fixed Borderlands 4's stuttering issue by upping my shader cache size to 100 GB, which feels like something I shouldn't have to do in a well-optimised gamewww.pcgamer.comexternal-linkmessage-square43fedilinkarrow-up1153arrow-down10
arrow-up1153arrow-down1external-linkI fixed Borderlands 4's stuttering issue by upping my shader cache size to 100 GB, which feels like something I shouldn't have to do in a well-optimised gamewww.pcgamer.comalyaza [they/she]@beehaw.orgM to Gaming@beehaw.orgEnglish · 5 days agomessage-square43fedilink
minus-squareCoelacanth@feddit.nulinkfedilinkarrow-up69·5 days ago250GB install sizes plus an additional 100GB shader caches. This is what the future looks like, buckle up.
minus-squareJrockwar@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up85·edit-25 days agoFor a cartoon game. With the aesthetics they have, this could have been playable on the steam deck without anybody noticing the difference in graphics. Why do they need 2-billion-polygon rocks only to flatten them all out and make it look like a cardboard cutout? It’s ridiculous.
minus-squareThe Quuuuuill@slrpnk.netlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up28·5 days agomanagers have insane priorities
minus-squareMangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up21·5 days agoIt could have looked like BL2 with a few upgrades and more physics and that would have been fine.
minus-squareSmoochyPit@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up5·5 days agoBL2 even had some PhysX simulations when using an Nvidia card for particles and effects, so between those and running at higher internal resolutions and framerates, it’s already better than the new one in some areas.
minus-squaresnooggums@piefed.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23·5 days agoNah, this is just one horribly unoptimized game.
250GB install sizes plus an additional 100GB shader caches. This is what the future looks like, buckle up.
For a cartoon game.
With the aesthetics they have, this could have been playable on the steam deck without anybody noticing the difference in graphics.
Why do they need 2-billion-polygon rocks only to flatten them all out and make it look like a cardboard cutout? It’s ridiculous.
managers have insane priorities
It could have looked like BL2 with a few upgrades and more physics and that would have been fine.
BL2 even had some PhysX simulations when using an Nvidia card for particles and effects, so between those and running at higher internal resolutions and framerates, it’s already better than the new one in some areas.
Nah, this is just one horribly unoptimized game.
250GBs? Cries in DSL