• hperrin@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    16 days ago

    Personally, I think carriage return line feed makes more sense in the context of a printer carriage. But then, how often are people using printers like that?

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 days ago

      It was probably designed like that because line printers were the thing in the early days of Windows.

      • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        16 days ago

        That’s in TFA.

        Having two characters: CR followed by LF allowed time for a teletype to physically return its carriage before printing the next printable character.

      • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        16 days ago

        Not sure about that. Even the IBM 5150, which was the computer where DOS was first released and also coined the term “PC”, had a video card come as standard.

      • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 days ago

        Unix was developed in 1969. MS-DOS (from where Windows inherits its baggage) was developed in 1981. And DOS was basically a clone of CP/M developed in 1974.

        So I dont see why windows would be designed with line printers in mind when its younger than unix. Its even more strange because CP/M and DOS were “microcomputer” OS and unlikely to ever operate a teletyper, while unix was primarily a mainframe OS that certainly would be operating a teletyper.

        Then you have MacOs being a weirdo and just using CR.