This is the direction we should be moving in.

Bravo.

  • solrize@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    It is pretty lame. I have a far more aggressive one written in python that I use in a shell window. One of these days I want to rewrite it in JS and turn it into a firefox extension.

    • Ephera@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s the bane of being built-in. You don’t have an extension page to explain to people that the link might not work anymore. You certainly also can’t assume that your users should know of such a possibility, because this can be clicked by any user.

      I guess, there could be like a workflow where it opens the URL in a new tab and asks you, if it still works, but that’s also a good way to ensure your less techy users will not press that button again…

      • solrize@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        3 days ago

        Nah, the Firefox thing just seems to have one or two rules, like remove utm_whatever=something parameters. If you expand that to 10 or 20 rules, some of which are site specific like cleaning ALL the parameters from ebay links and doing some similar rewriting with Amazon links, removing gclid and fclid from everything, retrieving the content of a few of the more common link shorteners and cleaning -that- up, etc., you can get a much less trashy experience with maybe 1 page of code. Adblock already does some of that with its site filtering. You don’t get everything, but a little bit goes a long way.