cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 19 hours agoAll of IT in one imagelemmy.mlimagemessage-square31fedilinkarrow-up1778arrow-down16cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1772arrow-down1imageAll of IT in one imagelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 19 hours agomessage-square31fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareScoopta@programming.devcakelinkfedilinkarrow-up34arrow-down4·18 hours agoAs someone who mostly avoids JavaScript, I don’t see the IT in this image, I just see a bad language I avoid!
minus-squareblackn1ght@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up10arrow-down3·14 hours agoThis isn’t the languages fault, it’s the developers.
minus-squarecopd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 hours agobesides NaN actually being a number, this could completely and easily be avoided with typescript.
minus-squareLog in | Sign up@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·16 hours agoI had the exact same reaction.
As someone who mostly avoids JavaScript, I don’t see the IT in this image, I just see a bad language I avoid!
This isn’t the languages fault, it’s the developers.
besides NaN actually being a number, this could completely and easily be avoided with typescript.
I had the exact same reaction.