cm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 14 hours agoAll of IT in one imagelemmy.mlimagemessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up1694arrow-down15cross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1689arrow-down1imageAll of IT in one imagelemmy.mlcm0002@lemmy.world to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 14 hours agomessage-square26fedilinkcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squareblackn1ght@feddit.uklinkfedilinkarrow-up6arrow-down3·10 hours agoThis isn’t the languages fault, it’s the developers.
minus-squarecopd@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·8 minutes agobesides NaN actually being a number, this could completely and easily be avoided with typescript.
This isn’t the languages fault, it’s the developers.
besides NaN actually being a number, this could completely and easily be avoided with typescript.