It’s a fact.

    • dzsimbo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Maybe the time for mutual understanding has passed.

      If you feel nazis are your main baddie, it might be better to understand what makes them tick. If not for empathy, then for hitting where it hurts.

      Why do you say I am denying the presence of nazis? They are usually a niche demographic, but present in any country. I am not saying let the bastards speak hate with impunity.

      • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        59 minutes ago

        They are usually a niche demographic, but present in any country.

        The difference is that in the Baltics and Ukraine this is not a niche demographic anymore. Pro-Nazi views are either the norm or they appear to be because the state has been legitimizing and endorsing pro-Nazi views while suppressing the opposite viewpoint.

        You see, most other countries do not officially celebrate SS regiments with parades, they don’t name their streets after or erect monuments to Nazi collaborators who participated in the Holocaust and brutally butchered hundreds of thousands of people, and they don’t teach children in schools to hate people of a certain ethnicity while teaching that Nazi collaborators were actually national heroes and freedom fighters, all while monuments and graves of the real liberators and anti-fascist fighters are destroyed.

        If you feel nazis are your main baddie, it might be better to understand what makes them tick.

        Are you implying that Nazis are not “baddies”?

        What makes Nazis tick is hate and sadism. There is nothing deeper to understand there. And as long as that hate continues to be taught and endorsed by a country’s institutions, from the state to the educational system to media and NGOs, as is happening in Ukraine and the Baltics, the problem will only get worse.

      • Bloomcole@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        "They went in to Ukraine under the flag of denazification. "
        You said that as if it wasn’t true and stopping the ethnic cleansing of the large Russian speaking population wasn’t valid enough reason in itself.
        The other reason was demilitarisation.
        Also a valid reason since NATO expansion right next to them, undoubtably with nukes, is an existential threat.
        Russia gave them plenty of chances to prevent war but they didn’t listen.
        Never intended to honor the Minsk accords, as Merkel admitted, and only used it to buid up their army.
        It was the west that started this with their regime change coup and wanted this to happen.
        A proxy to be used and then thrown away.
        It is their usual MO.

        • Geobloke@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          57 minutes ago

          The nukes have been an existential that since the 50s…

          Has Russia even attempted to make a public case for Ukrainians perpetrating genocide at the UN?