• Fox@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 year ago

      ATTENTION

      Your account has been flagged for CCP tankie shill-like activity. Please review These Nuts and never forget that Mao killed more people than Stalin and Hitler combined!

        • Fox@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your logic is baffling. Hitler killed millions of people in the Holocaust. Mao killed millions more, yet he’s still a folk hero. Where is the disconnect here?

          • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            106
            arrow-down
            8
            ·
            1 year ago

            That the only way you can come to the conclusion that Mao “killed more” is if you’re deliberately downplaying how many Hitler killed, aka Holocaust denial.

            • Fox@pawb.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              8
              ·
              1 year ago

              I may have missed the lesson where numbers aren’t allowed to be bigger than other numbers, so let me rephrase this in a way you might be able to understand. The most conservative estimate of famine deaths during the Great Leap Forward (backward) is greater than the ENTIRE European Jewish population in 1933 by at least six million.

              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                96
                arrow-down
                5
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Famines were extremely common before the CPC came to power. Most Chinese people lived in extreme poverty, and life expectancy was less than 35, with no significant improvement under the KMT. In between Mao coming to power and his death, life expectancy in China nearly doubled. Today, average life expectancy in China has exceeded that of the US, a feat that would’ve been unimaginable back then.

                It’s true that Mao made misteps (which the CPC readily admits), but those specific, dramatic events have been disproportionately elevated to obscure the more general trend, which has been drastic improvements in the lives of the people of China.

                Of course, in addition to minimizing the frequency and severity of famines in pre-industrial China, your history books likely did not place the same level of blame on the British for the intentional famines which Ireland and India were subjected to, in which Britain did not only refuse to provide aid to their colonial subjects (often on the express basis that it would motivate people to work harder), but also did not cease their plundering - in both cases, food was exported out of the country while the people starved.

                • Frank [he/him, he/him]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  39
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I read somewhere that Mao’s family was considered well off for peasants because they could afford eggs a few times a year. I have no idea if there’s any truth to that.

                  • NPa [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    37
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    They had to go hat in hand to the Egg Monopoly Lady every year to ask for a single egg for their New Years Celebration.

              • meth_dragon [none/use name]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                84
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                the GLF was economic policy made in response to withdrawal of soviet technological and financial aid during the sino-soviet split, one of the primary motivating factors of which being soviet insistence on china essentially allowing the soviets to recolonize the port of dalian to build a naval base from which to deploy its pacific fleet.

                on top of being under sanctions from the west, the sino-soviet split further deprived china of markets with which to support its all-important capital intensive industries and so china was forced to resort to agricultural export as a method of making up the shortfall. collectivization was also pursued simultaneously to pool domestic capital for internal consumption, but due to various geographical, technical and political considerations, internal consumption was not sufficiently stimulated to support manufacturing, and so agricultural export became the primary way to finance china’s continued industrialization. most accounts that are not hysterically anti-communist (including liberal darling amartya sen) of the period around the 1958 famine have records of aggregate production being more than sufficient to sustain the overall population, with the primary points of failure being overzealous local governments in highly productive areas, as opposed to popular western conceptions of overbearing central government mandated directives.

                all this to say that hitler and the holocaust’s relevance as a point of comparison to mao and the GLF as anything beyond ‘people died when he was in charge’ is laughably superficial and mostly only functions as a thought terminating associative fallacy for juicing your dopamine receptors in order to immunize your brain against more correct opinions.

              • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                80
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Source: it came to me in a dream.

                I also like how you’re deliberately trying to whitewash Hitler by ignoring all the non-Jewish deaths he was responsible for.

                Seriously, you’re trying to argue that Mao “killed” every single person who starved to death in a famine, but Hitler is completely innocent of any of the deaths that occurred in World War 2. It’s a double standard no one would employ unless they were trying to downplay Hitler’s crimes.

                • Fox@pawb.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  6
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That’s how it works in a dictatorship right? The fish stinks from the head.

                  To address your disingenuous bad-faith argument, counting non-Jews you have 11 or so million total dead in the Holocaust, we are still nowhere near it. Fuck Hitler, fuck Stalin, fuck Mao, the CCP, and fuck the US federal government.

                  • brain_in_a_box [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    72
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Again, you’re saying Mao is guilty of every death in a famine because he was a “dictator”, but Hitler isn’t responsible for any of the deaths in WW2 (even the deaths by famine it caused).

                    You really are working hard to white wash Hitler.

            • emizeko [they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              China’s growth in life expectancy between 1950 and 1980 ranks as among the most rapid sustained increases in documented global history.

              louder, for everyone in the back.

              CHINA’S GROWTH IN LIFE EXPECTANCY BETWEEN 1950 AND 1980 RANKS AS AMONG THE MOST RAPID SUSTAINED INCREASES IN DOCUMENTED GLOBAL HISTORY.

              :mao-wave:

          • ProxyTheAwesome [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            34
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hitler killed millions of people in the Holocaust.

            Fascism did this, not Hitler alone. Fascism and Capitalist Imperialism (western as well) started a world war that killed nearly 100 million people in WW2. Mao did not kill anywhere near that much, it’s reactionary nonsense. China experienced the greatest increase in life expectancy in history under Mao

          • Ram_The_Manparts [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            It’s funny how you clowns keep pretending that the only deaths Hitler caused were the ones that specifically happened in the death camps, as if he didn’t literally start WWII. And meanwhile you insist that every single stubbed toe and premature ejaculation that ever happened in a socialist country should be added to the “victims of communism” death toll.

            The double standard is baffling.

          • TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            20
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            1 year ago

            Mao killed trillions of people!!1!1!1111 Stalin killed zillions and Xi is killing gorillions!1111!!1! Omgomgomg wake up sheeple, time to inbade chyna! Heil Amerikkka, Heil Anglostani!

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Scanning Umberto Eco’s 14 points, China ticks most of them.

              It’s certainly not communist else they would be redistributing the wealth of the billionaires, not welcoming them into the ruling party.

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                else they would be redistributing the wealth of the billionaires, not welcoming them into the ruling party.

                Hey look who wants to have an opinion without doing investigation. Is it any surprise they’re only able to speak nonsense?

                  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    1 year ago

                    Wow you’re such a :LIB: that you can’t even be bothered to read what you yourself write susie-laugh

                    Does your brain turn to mush every time you’re questioned or only the times you get quoted? Did you use words that were too big for yourself? michael-laugh

            • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Cancel culture is just changing the channel when there’s someone on your TV screen that you don’t like.

              You want go clockwork orange and strap people down, tape their eyes open and force them to watch the things you want them to watch? Because that would ensure the freedom of the people on TV to say whatever they want, right? The freedom of Hollywood assholes are more important that our freedom to change the channel, amirite?

              • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 year ago

                What the fuck are you even talking about with Hollywood and television? Are you on a script? Bitch, you’re the one complaining about cancel culture. You’re the one equating being made fun of for having stupid reactionary opinions to literal torture. Can you please put in the absolute bare minimum of effort when you speak to at least remember the topic of fucking discussion??

                I haven’t been so befuddled by a completely deranged and incoherent reply since I last posted on reddit-logo. Buddy I do not miss dealing with dipshits like you.

                • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Just illustrating the point of how stupid the cancel culture is. If you’re not someone in TV, why would you give a shit about it?

                  • AntiOutsideAktion [he/him]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I understand the liberal brainpan isn’t capable of maintaining a thought or any information for longer than a few sentences, but this is really exceptional. Why are you acting like you weren’t the one crying about cancel culture in the first place? Why do you compare being bullied for your reactionary opinions with torture? Are you stupid?

        • Zoboomafoo@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          1 year ago

          “More Indians died from british colonialism than have ever existed” is not a great argument