I think a concern for the business is whether other people can help maintain the system. As such don’t go too custom and roll your own. Take things like nextcloud and see if you can fit the requirements by bolting on a few docker services. Keep it simple by using “appliances” where it makes sense (dedicated NAS?).

Who needs IP laws when you have EULAs that bar competition? Certainly not corporations with their armies of lawyers.

I lived through those times, this is different. The punishment for false hope is the lesson that things can always get worse.

We’re cooked because our leaders are pumping the AI bubble while crashing the rest of the economy. When that bubble pops those programmers are going to have to find a job in a nuclear sized crater of where the economy used to be.

If we can’t explain the difference, AI must be sentient? This argument reminds me of “God of the gaps”.

So use it on things no one cares about, got it.

After 2 weeks I think they would say something if they had something, and even then…

Too bad the other posts where people took the time to explain to you that the CCP isn’t what you claimed it was, has been removed.

That is the definition of liberalism but that is not the loved experience of unhoused people in the USA. If you are unhoused there are a lot of moral judgements that come along with that.

Harder? Being queer and unhoused can be pretty damn bad in the states. In China your boss might say something bad but you don’t have to worry about being homeless.

But those are for hire. Unlike American Democracy, the CCP can’t be bought.

Yeah, I got questions about Tienanmen, but not the same ones. Like was the CIA involved in the counter protest outside the school campus?

Also, there is searchable queer content on RedNote, the app own by the CCP

Sounds like the parents have decided they’re too old (or she is too old) to deal with this shit

Would SCOTUS make an example of the wealthiest man in order to preserve their own relevance? 🤔

I am a leaf on the wind, watch how I soar

Sure, I’m on board as long as the fix isn’t to cut other social safety nets.

I mean it depends on the context of how UBI is going to get paid for. If it is funded by a wealth tax then I am on board. But that’s not how the powerful proponents of UBI say it should be funded. Andrew Yang would have us take it out of Social Security to pay for it but you don’t hear him say we should uncap Social Security contributions.

AI is maturing into what exactly?

How to alienate your daughter:

It’s not a conspiracy, it is just the path of least resistance. Which is why capitalism is the problem.