You can either mitigate the inevitable damage
At some point we need to admit that harm reduction still means harm. At the very least, we shouldn’t berate people for looking for alternatives when the options presented would both cause unnecessary damage.
At some point you just aren’t voting for people who don’t represent you and your beliefs, which is kind of what democracy is all about.
Only reason to be anti genocide is you being an Iranian agent.
What a thing to say. Really, just step back and look at the words you wrote.
Yeah, but have you considered the electoral college? For most people, their vote for president doesn’t matter.
It also didn’t help that it was one of the first $70 games when the norm was $60.
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLOBp3v-_cPa2f05inQWNrm0KMd6VHSgyc
Youtube says there are only 441 videos in the complete series, I’m sure you’ll find your cousin eventually.
Although it is weird, wikipedia and archive.org are telling me there should only be 65.
4chan anon who made significant contribution to a math problem in order to find the best way to watch an anime
Looks like this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superpermutation based on the content of the wikipedia article
Then go away and live your life. Let the people who are angry and energized yell at companies to try and get better conditions for consumers.
Given r=f(θ), we are generally not concerned with r′=f′(θ); that describes how fast r changes with respect to θ
You’re using the derivative of a polar equation as the basis for what a tangent line is. But as the textbook explains, that doesn’t give you a tangent line or describe the slope at that point. I never bothered defining what “tangent” means, but since this seems so important to you why don’t you try coming up with a reasonable definition?
I think we fundamentally don’t agree on what “tangent” means. You can use
x=f(θ)cosθ, y=f(θ)sinθ to compute dydx
as taken from the textbook, giving you a tangent line in the terms used in polar coordinates. I think your line of reasoning would lead to r=1 in polar coordinates being a line, even though it’s a circle with radius 1.
Given r=f(θ), we are generally not concerned with r′=f′(θ); that describes how fast r changes with respect to θ
I think this part from the textbook describes what you’re talking about
Instead, we will use x=f(θ)cosθ, y=f(θ)sinθ to compute dydx.
And this would give you the actual tangent line, or at least the slope of that line.
Polar Functions and dydx
We are interested in the lines tangent a given graph, regardless of whether that graph is produced by rectangular, parametric, or polar equations. In each of these contexts, the slope of the tangent line is dydx. Given r=f(θ), we are generally not concerned with r′=f′(θ); that describes how fast r changes with respect to θ. Instead, we will use x=f(θ)cosθ, y=f(θ)sinθ to compute dydx.
From the link above. I really don’t understand why you seem to think a tangent line in polar coordinates would be a circle.
A straight line in polar coordinates with the same tangent would be a circle.
I’m not sure that’s true. In non-euclidean geometry it might be, but aren’t polar coordinates just an alternative way of expressing cartesian?
Looking at a libre textbook, it seems to be showing that a tangent line in polar coordinates is still a straight line, not a circle.
The tangent of all points along the line equal that line
Looks like the back of someone’s head to me, but the picture is kind of blurry
https://www.tacobell.com/food/burritos/beefy-5-layer-burrito
Looks like the actual price is $3.79
No, I don’t think you’re going to do anything either way. When there was only the Raytheon protest, I doubt you called your state representatives about Palestine. Now that they’re also blocking traffic, I’m sure you’ll continue to do nothing.
I think the most effective protest would be one that directly acts against what they’re protesting against, like putting traffic cones on self driving cars or the Tyre Extinguishers deflating tires.
But that kind of protest doesn’t really apply to sending billions of dollars worth of weapons overseas unless you want to do something very illegal or violent. So whatever the people protesting think will help seems good enough to me.
Is getting a news story all that matters for an “effective” protest? If so, you must think blocking traffic is an incredibly effective protest strategy.
If absolutely nothing else, it’s conflating support for Palestinians with support for Hamas and is suggesting that the use of indiscriminate explosives is a cool and funny thing to do (assuming you believe him that it was a joke).
But more to the point, if you were to randomly say “I hope you don’t die” or “I hope you don’t get cancer” or even “I hope you don’t stub your toe in the middle of the night” while having a heated argument with someone, it will never be taken as you actually hoping for those things to not happen.