Idk I’m not a pharmacist, but I do work in biotech and have access to systems with PHI. All I’m saying is I treat this whole area with an abundance of caution.

It’s not about motivation. It’s about “is it feasibly possible to actually identify a person from this partially-obscured PHI”. But also, who the fuck knows if they’re going to care about enforcing PHI and HIPAA laws now 🫠

Which is precisely my point - if I were so motivated, I could suss that out. Or do a partial/fragmentary OCR match on valid addresses in Ohio that align with possible zip code matches and narrow it down to a relatively small potential target set of addresses and individuals.

FWIW I heard the show was extremely bad, and I had to see for myself.

It is very, very bad.

lol

But also, you should obscure that PHI more completely, just to be cautious.

lol this will definitely not negatively impact quality in any way. No sir.

W… wow.

• depth first search
• breadth first search

Or more accurately, randomly swap between those strategies based on a coin, a d20, and a cat chasing a laser pointer

Lmfao it’s always DNS

Sick, this will make shifting to bazzite nicer

❗️

Is it weird that I just went

start: 75

to actual decimal: .75

*2*2: 1.5 -> 3

🤘

.:|:;

Being ethical to H100 clusters running inferences on models that were created with stolen, pirated, and appropriated data does not matter. Abuse the shit out of them. It’s absolutely meaningless.

Or just don’t use them, if you care at all about economic, ecological, and societal stability.

Talk to me, goose

It’s really wild the amount of shit that most providers DON’T tell or make clear to people

For instance, this is the first time I’ve seen the term “Concerta Crash”; I’m in my late 30s; I took concerta from about 10 until about a month ago (though I was off meds completely for over a decade until the Rona times), and started Vyvanse last month.

No, you just never saw the meme before. It’s an old one.