I thought you were going in a different direction (Even without a Facebook account, Meta has your contact info because they scanned your friend’s phone) but both are true. I’ve had similar conversations about it and privacy is not a value most people think is worth standing for. The convenience always outweighs what, for them, is a non-issue.
Restaurants don’t make their own fortune cookies, that is true, but there’s hundreds and hundreds of fortune cookie manufacturers in the US. Outside of chain restaurants, I’d wager most buy from local suppliers. Next time you get one, look up the manufacturer on the label
But there’s another near-flavorless cracker whose production IS almost entirely centralized…The majority of the mass-produced communion wafers in the US are made by one company in Rhode Island.
What is this community? First it’s all reddit reposts and now it’s this
Yeah, I don’t think any post that is written in first person should be mirrored
Maybe we’re all reddit replybots…
You’re giving advice to a reddit repost bot
I’m mildly infuriated that you’re just reposting stuff from the subreddit. A place like this should be OC-only otherwise it’s just ragebait, you’re venting for someone else
Of all the search engines, Jeeves makes me the most sense as an LLM chatbot. It was already personified
I don’t have autism but I think this is a bad question. It’s not asking about the test taker, it’s asking about their social circle.
Like if you mostly talk to other autistic people in your life, you’re gonna get called out for it less than if you worked at a corporate office
You can selectively shift hues pretty easily in photoshopa
I don’t think you interpreted the joke correctly if it led to this comment
And like the chad guy, we’re using it to make fun of people who use it in earnest. We’re not calling people soyboys and do not need to avoid the word “soyjak”
Is this a bit where you play a caricature of a 2010 Tumblr user? Soyjak is the name of the meme character.
The lines they’ve set with their piss borders need to be refreshed but they absolutely have declared areas that others respect the boundaries at risk of getting attacked.
A wolf occasionally crossing that border - either deliberately or because the scent wore off - doesn’t change the point that they’re making. It’s not like they put up a physical fence.
Yes because it doesn’t change the author’s point in the slightest
The article is 6 sentences long and 2 of the sentences are speculation from the author.
This is not a good article.
There is nothing TO understand. It’s “this thing happened. Here’s two statements of what that might mean”
There’s is no useful information in this article, just speculation
This breakthrough suggests that, with just three satellites, China could achieve global, 24/7, all-weather reconnaissance coverage of high-value targets, including US naval fleets.
To match this capability, other countries might need to deploy hundreds, if not thousands, of satellites.
Suggests that…Might need to…I don’t think the author is familiar with the subject matter they’re reporting on
So it is doubling down when you’re proven wrong that gives you a pants tent or is it moving the goalposts that gets you going? Can’t really tell between your two replies