Correct, capitalism is just a system intended to prioritize capital using markets. Science is a methodology of determining truth. As a method, it is tautologically “perfect” because all failures are to be accounted for by the very methodology. The choices that capitalist systems make and socialist systems would make may be different, but the decision-making process itself could be run scientifically.

Define healthy. Nicotine is a stimulant and does improve mental acuity.

Pulp - Common People

Quantum computing got us the Donald Biden superposition

TBF all those sci-fi transparent displays would be terrible to use

I also recreated your adventure and could not find the proper answer. Just awful.

Umm, or just go to the youtube channel, click the more link on the description, click “share channel” button and click “copy channel id”

Yeah, it’s not about complexity things you can do with python, it’s the complexity of getting it to run. That continues to be the biggest pain point for me.

Dinna’ please

There is something to that, in that money gained will be kept (unless lawsuits can claw it away for fraud), but with both scenarios the ethically lacking individual would still have enjoyed the time until they were caught and future money/clout would both be hampered.

As for competition, that sounds the same to me. There is already competition for positions and grants, etc.

OK, so money corrupts, money exists, everything is corrupt. What’s the point of pointing that out?

That’s only because money exists. If you removed money from the equation, clout would be the new currency that everyone lies and cheats for.

This kind of behavior would still exist without money. People would still fake stuff for the clout.

Anyone else in London I would assume.

Drink more water, that’s my solution

Pretty sure that’s an air pistol and firing an actual pistol like that (assuming something big enough actually blow a head off) would do weird things to her shoulder.

Can this be done with emoji?

Let’s engage in a thought experiment.

If Harris were to have negotiated a $15 minimum wage with Republicans but to do so had to give up the EPA. Would that earn your favor?

Let us assume that giving up the EPA is too much, do you see a world where the Republicans agree to anything while getting anything you are OK with giving up?

Perhaps you and the Republicans share some common wedge issue, do you think you would get any Democratic support for a bill that makes that trade?

Minimum wage is currently a partisan issue, a party that believes it should be increased and a party who doesn’t think it should exist. Just keeping it is as is is a negotiation.

Not to give anyone any ideas, but have they tried “Let’s Go Brenda”?

Windows has beta channels for their updates