Nationalize Tesla and X too.

Did you go with purple?

Except for the bourgeoisie, most fascists are tricked or indoctrinated into supporting fascism though. Grandma doesn’t support fascism because she will benefit, but because she’s been told the most marginalized people in society are exploiting her and the fascists promise to stop that.

Yes, there’s a monochrome display in the middle. It’s kinda like a TI-86 calculator aimed at children.

It’s not the democratic politicians who were robbed. It’s the democratic politicians who were complicit in us getting robbed of our rights.

Yup, the only reason we got Harris to replace Biden was that it was made clear that Biden didn’t have a snowball’s chance in hell.

Sadly, it was not made clear enough that it was a policy issue, so now we have Harris adopting every unpopular republican policy she can manage.

It’s kinda crazy that 3 nuclear armed countries have periodic armed skirmishes.

There’s at least one prehistorical nuclear reactor

That’s what I learned in school, but there’s been some research since suggesting stars produces significant quantities of elements up to lead during their lifetimes, even though it’s a net energy loss.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S-process

Surface-Air-Missiles to prevent Lebanon and Iran from defending themselves, not to shell cities.

Each missile cost ~16 million. An entire battery costs 1.6 billion.

If I’m right it was the population who fraught back their oppressive regime but I can’t remember exactly when or where

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/People’s_Liberation_Army_at_the_1989_Tiananmen_Square_protests_and_massacre#June_5–7

Nobody knows who the guy was, who the guys who brought him away were, or what he was yelling at the soldiers about.

In 1990, the CPC essentially said “We got the guy’s name from some journalists, and the name isn’t listed as dead or imprisoned so who knows if that’s the real guy and what happened”

It makes it pretty clear how insanely unfeasible a ground invasion of Iran would be even with the most optimistic assumptions.

1.3 million just for the occupation of an 88 million pop country, and that number just comes from other occupations, without taking into consideration the terrain or people or last 50 years of preparation for asymmetrical warfare.

If anyone wants, here’s an extremely optimistic 2009 Brookings Institute white paper on how various hostile actions against Iran would play out based off numbers and history.

Chapter 3 analyses a “boots on the ground” invasion (the occupation would require a draft), Chapters 4-6 analyze American and Israeli airstrikes. Neither of them expect Iran to employ masses of drones or close the strait, and they consider ballistic missiles against US assets unlikely.

While they have an extreme western bias, there’s no way you can twist the numbers to look good.

How did it get there?

The westerners ARE wrong though, like the story I and I’m sure many others, including OP learned is directly contradicted by the evidence.

The British government’s public releases about China are not credible, even less so when they conflict with evidence.

Removed by mod

Removed by mod

A handful of protesters killing cops and soldiers does not justify indiscriminate murder, particularly when you consider it the government’s responsibility to make sure protesters never get to the point that they feel the need to lynch and burn cops to achieve their aims. I didn’t think I needed to spell that out.

There’s a huge difference between “the famine never happened” and “The widespread crop failures caused famines in some regions due to ineffective policies, bad estimates grain production, and local conflict”.

The former is just as wildly ahistorical as the “Stalin did holodomer because he was evil” that’s taught in schools.