Yes, which is why it’s more fruitful to say willing or unwilling. You people have misused the word so much it has lost meaning. Congratulations.
It’s dumb how someone can be ‘raped’ in one jurisdiction, but not raped in another.
People want to conflate rape with having sex with 17 year olds because it elicits shock value in those who don’t know any better.
No it’s not.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Remus
Man admitted to killing his wife during prohibition after she divorced him while he was in jail and sold all of his belongings.
He was acquitted.
To be fair, females tend to regret having sex in their teenage years way more often than males.
It’s almost as if the system expects a greater level of maturity and accountability from Black male juveniles than it does adult white women.
What a great way of putting it.
Statutory rape is not the same as having sex with someone against their will.
We should be saying “willing” or “unwilling” to get this point across without seeming like we’re trying to manipulate others.
So it’s rape in some places but not others?
Weird how rape works.
Because it wasn’t rape.
Rape is forced sex. He was willing.
You’re just trying to conflate the legal definition of rape with “having sex with someone against their will.” They are not the same and never will be.
1 year older, different jurisdiction, yadayadayada.
The only person saying the kid was ‘affected’ is his mother. This is clearly a load of crap by people who can’t comprehend that a 17 year old male might actually want to have sex with a 25 year old female and not end up regretting it later.
Good. Women having sex with teenage males is not the same as men having sex with teenage females.
It just isn’t, although this simple fact will upset a lot of neurotic people.
Notice how the only people complaining are his mom and classmates? Something tells me he’s not going to regret this later like what happens with most females who have sex as teenagers, but I guess we’ll have to wait and see.
The endgame is going to be those who rely on this software paying to maintain it.
Err, KDE at least gives people the option to configure their system how they want.
GNOME takes those options away, so if you don’t like what they have then you’re stuck.
GNOME with Dash to Panel
Yeah, it also requires a lot of 3rd party addons to achieve basic functionality. Laymen shouldn’t have to search for these, and they also shouldn’t have to deal with them when they inevitably break.
Gnome hasn’t been for normal users since Gnome2. That’s when they started doing things “the gnome way” instead of just what’s pragmatic.
Still in the process of moving my server from Ubuntu to Debian.
Maybe it’s just me, but I doubt this will be very effective.
I feel legitimately sorry for anyone who takes your rhetoric to heart.
Try not to let these 🧩’s pull you down rabbit holes, guys.
I guess this is one of those instances where Manjaro holding back packages makes it more secure than Arch, not less.
tens of hundreds
You mean thousands?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Female_genital_mutilation
Saudi Arabia cuts off the clits of pre-teen girls as ritual.
Seems like the system is working fine here.