Basically me during the pandemic lol

As mentioned before there is indeed an API. Please keep in mind that some instances have rules on how to run a bot. On lemmy.world for instance you need express permission from the mods of the community you are using the bot in, you should obviously mark the bot account as a bot account and the name should make it clear that it is in fact a bot.

Happy cakeday!

I really like solution 3, I hope that get’s implemented at some time. Though one potential problem is; what if pancakes@a.com is subscribed to pancaked@b.com and a user from e.com, who is defederated from b.com but not to a.com, tries to browse pancakes@a.com? Would they see the posts from pancakes@b.com?

If yes, that seems like a way to go around defederation, which I think is not a good thing always.

If no, how do you prevent the user from accidentally reposting something that they could have no way of knowing was already posted?

Different sites use different ways of calculating but often a user is considered active if they posted anything in x amount of days.

So all lemmy servers can communicate with eachother, unless a server decided to “defederate” with another which cuts the connection.

Futhermore, mastodon and other fediverse projects can also communicate with lemmy and back, but since the format of the posts and comments is a bit different this might take some work for the devs to get working completely correctly.

Oh well, just wait till inevitably reddit does something stupid again and those numbers will go sky high again.

Also, if twitter where to fail eventually and a lot of people join mastadon, I think the amount of people using lemmy would also go up because people get familair with the fediverse.

Same, I really hope they will improve it soon.

This is the way

Oh lol, sorry then

Two words: plastic filters

This sounds like you’re pitching me your new meme crypto coin.

Late reaction, but this was about some asshole that was creating new accounts to spam CSAM. Admins didn’t really have a choice here.

The trick is to move up north

Is this AI generated?

It’s very easy to describe movies in a way that make them sound very unappealing. This movie is amazing tho, watch it!

Really depends on where in the Netherlands you are. amsterdam: yes, very diverse. Random ass village: piet and jan welcome you.

Then we am I not laughing?

Raycast is like alfred but free.

You’re on programmer humor, we don’t do “Brain” here.

Use lichess.org’s board editor

That implies that they are still going up, even though they fall a few times.

Let’s hope that’s not what’s happening.

A lot of the ennoying bots existed because reddit accounts with karma where worth money. Well… there is no karma here.

Time to make it 50% water and % 50% weed.

Yea, that was me, sorry.

“But did you think about the shareholders?”

They have a completely different UI, so I don’t think that’s likely, but I might be wrong.

I suggest looking through the “All” tab of the communities list. And just look if you see any sub that you think you would like. You can always unjoin (:

Didn’t know family could marry!

But… But then we can’t have 2000 employees, 10 for the website and -2 for the app and 1992 to support the mental well being of those other employees.

Yup it’s amazing! I love how you can play it with anyone, you only give them a 3 seconds explanation, and then they might kick your ass within a few seconds.

Boomerangfu isn’t splitscreen, it’s one screen, but it’s still local multiplayer with controller support

Oof… painfull

You can use MLEM It’s still in test flight, but works pretty OK.

Here’s the testflight page: https://testflight.apple.com/join/xQfmkJhc

Jup, legal eagle fan here (:

I think they will probably whitelist google’s and microsoft’s webcrawlers, seeing as it’s kinda a huge source of traffic for them. But I’m far from an expert in this field XD

mmm… that’s exactly what chatGPT would say…

Really? Doesn’t google and similar search engines use web crawlers, outside of the devloper API of reddit? Or is that different for reddit?

True, but the chance of it being wrong is substantially smaller than the chance of chatGTP dreaming up something.

Yea, but I would like an option to also hide posts that I scrolled past.