
Get mogged
Get mogged
You want 8 pies? What?
Dont you dare use a Latin pluralization of a Greek root word!
Ok where can I buy this obvious joke? I want to make cis men nervous.
Lean over with a good grippy glove and wrench that little blue bitch out.
Or buy Honda Part number 07AAA-PLCA100 and a ratchet.
No, it’s bait. The actual series is far more weird and not sexual. It devolves into these women with some sort of weird monkey man looking on and being tormented in the shower.
The artist did realize how popular this image has become, and has since pivoted to making only weirdly sexy photos of these women.
His name is Eugeny Hramenkov if you’re going to go searching.
Got that server migration to Meta done in only 14 hours
The NY charge calls for a specific action taken against a government entity.
Unless UHC is part of the government, but corporations as government is Musolini style fascism, and the US isn’t a fascist country, right?
As somebody with kids, I feel the same way. People asking “are you gonne have more?” Or “were you trying?”
Like yeah I jazz up in there on the reg Aunt Linda thanks for asking about me dropping these loads, pass the ham.
Tacquito can go about his business
They’re all at my house hell yeah 😎
Zoloft just means I get more cardio
Ok everyone trade one to the left
No, my point with “functionally” is that it can be killed.
Biological immortality is a very specific concept indicating an absence of aging and the absence of an increase in expected mortality along with age.
I just mean that something can still eat it. This is an easy concept to understand if you’re not focused on correcting people needlessly.
This is what I mean by functionally.
There is a functional difference between being pedantic about the word “functionally” and supplying relevant information.
My comment indicates that the animal can still die, your comment indicates it doesn’t age.
Do you see the meaningless distinction?
No, I meant functionally. As in practically. For all intents and purposes. As in under normal conditions.
It’s like if I said “You meant ‘searching for’ and not ‘looking for’”, when looking indicates visual searching.
In other words it’s a meaningless distinction in the usage and I would look like a real dickhead pedant if I insisted you use another word.
There is a species of jellyfish which is functionally immortal. When they get too old they simply turn into children again and re-age.
Edit: I’m not saying it’s not biologically immortal, I’m saying functionally immortal because I’m indicating that it can still be killed.
Saying something doesn’t experience aging is not the same as insisting it cannot die.
2+2=4 is not less correct because 2x2 also equals 4.
Buddy you best rethink who’s gonna be infecting who here, you don’t know where I’ve been