1,000 steps but only about 50 feet, huh?
1,000 steps but only about 50 feet, huh?
Many of them are just straight up lying, a little bit to you and a little bit to themselves.
For others, it’s the sense that they’ve lost the golden age of their fathers made BY and FOR their fathers alone, for which someone must pay.
Conclusion: I identify more strongly with Trump for being attacked for being right by bad people.
The sad thing is that, short of taking a mental sledgehammer to some really important internal concepts of self-esteem and value, you can’t stop this train of thought, and you’ll upset them for even suggesting it’s what they think. The closest you can get is putting in their heads the sense that Trump won’t win, in which case they’ll glom onto the next narcissistic, reactionary blowhard.
If you want some more detailed dissection of this thought process, read “The Authoritarians” by Bob Altmeyer: https://archive.org/details/The_Authoritarians_Bob_Altemeyer_2006.pdf/page/n2/mode/1up
It’s an easy read, but damn if it wasn’t chilling the first time I read it, back in the Obama years.
Sure, but there’s a distinction between maintenance and profit.
If that requires a maximum ratio of active users to average donation, then it’s feasible, and has the potential to survive with a more invested userbase than a site that’s severely bloated with lurkers.
For those of you who are multilingual from birth, do you have a preference?
Yeah, the best social networks are designed to prioritize…socializing. It’s like building a public park and people start asking where the money comes from. The point is that it’s made for people to use.
Oh no, not my productivity! That thing that is definitely directly proportional to my financial compensa-oh, right.
Dark mode forever and always, bitches.
Do they at least microwave the beers for you?