PoopOS

That seems like a rather narrow view of other people’s opinions on this matter

I’m gonna be real, it was obvious this guy had problems… like we can be happy he’s making leftist viewpoints mainstream, and acknowledge that he has serious issues, and know that it’s good for people to change their views over time, and recognize that the most recent allegations were timed very “conveniently”. We don’t have to just pick one.

I don’t know, all my cattle kept floating into the neighbor’s yard. One even hit the big glass dome that separates the sky from the heavens and got smited.

I nipped this in the bud in my server by just making ONE #hobbies channel. What if two people want to talk about their specific subject at the same time? Figure it out lmao or make a thread I guess

Hmm, fair

Yup

Meta tried very hard but their ideas of how VR/AR will be used are very misguided. I guess it could be used as a social media, but it’s really much more well-suited to games and especially tools, the latter of which is quite underexplored.

Blockchain does have uses, but for the most part it doesn’t improve on having a centralized trusted source. For situations where that + a method for recovering from the loss of that source is not sufficient, blockchain can offer advantages, although its adoption still suffers from the network effect like anything else does. Cryptocurrency is valid, NFTs have theoretically valid uses but have never actually been used for them, and crypto stocks are, as with any stock, just gambling.

Yeah, choosing to establish the semver social contract and then break it is not great

I don’t think it’s valid to simultaneously present open-source as a legitimate alternative for paid software, while also saying you can’t have expectations of the software or trust its guarantees (ie. semver) because it’s just a volunteer project. If you’re presenting your OSS in the serious space of choices for its niche, it will (and should be!) held to a high standard. If it can’t be, then don’t present it as a real alternative. I’ve noticed this (mostly-unintentional) conflation between serious OSS competitors and hobby projects in almost every discussion on this topic I’ve seen.

A dick

Commenting is just failed writers posting comments written by failed writers. I write comments and judge writers of failed comments by writers. Comments.

I’m not OP. You’re still doing it btw

You’re dodging the question

SMG4 core

Blockchain was an incredibly transparent grift. AI is a fascinating technology that’s being used and abused by the worst people on the planet and will probably cause society as we know it to collapse. Quantum computers are a very niche, very specific tool that are super cool but get talked about weirdly by the media.

Virtual reality is neat and I think it hasn’t really been used as a grift yet. I don’t think we’ve really solved its UX nor explored all its possibilities. It seems like as a consumer device it will be a niche product, but the applications for companies and organizations are very untapped.

If you don’t have an issue with something being both a poison and a tool then how does your original response make sense?

They certainly know how they taste

Yes. My point is that it being a tool does not prevent it from being a poison. Your argument is flawed.

Womp womp