Heat transfer will not limit much, but heat loss should add a significant amount of time. How did you model that?
Heat transfer will not limit much, but heat loss should add a significant amount of time. How did you model that?


It was just not feasible back then.

But that is not the same cover…?


Yeah no, completely useless on the real battlefield.
So not fully believing it then? Does not need to be a lie, but omitting things can be a lie.
I too have to ask: backwards? A doc does X ray every day, you get ONE.
When you say something fully believing it, it is not a lie, regardless of factual/objective correctness.

Sure it was, what makes you think otherwise? Slaves are inefficient. Actual workers generate more money for their boss. There is a reason slavery is so small today compared to 200 years ago despite the much higher wages.
Is that so? How does the propellant matter?
You can also use aerosol based ones, the propellant just has to be non crazy.

Eating rotten food is also important. Do it in the dark so you can’t see what garbage you are eating…
Are you aware that phones are a mayor source of accidents? Being distracted is one of the or the biggest reason for crashes in general. Looking down is a distraction, regardless what you are looking for.
No. If it were as cheap as steel, we wound make whole packages from it. Completely new things. We already use thicker and more gold plating where the cost is not as much of a factor, like space, medical and military stuff.
If you coat steel with gold and there is even the tiniest scratch/void/… it will extremely accelerate the rusting. Galvanic corrosion is no joke. That’s why you use zinc for the job.
If they cancel out, the system would be in balance and not get hotter. So some thing does not add up. What heat transfer coefficient did you use and which other numbers etc.?