• 0 Posts
  • 29 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 22nd, 2023

help-circle

  • Thanks for the pointer! I took the opportunity to learn a bit about more recent NNTP by reading the standard: RFC 3977. It looks like nntp v2 circa 2006 added MIME encoding, so I would guess that may be how a service provider would differentiate.

    I haven’t used Usenet since the turn of the century. Back then it was all text (including every article under alt.binaries), and even pirated media needed to be split into a multi-part format (often rar) then each part uuencoded so it could be included in an article.







  • Arcka@midwest.socialtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world5 tomatoes
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 days ago

    It might be funny if it were true, but it’s just a sad show of ignorance. It is exactly as possible in one as in the other for obvious reasons. It’s just not as easy to memorize.

    To be specific:

    • energy required to heat to boiling point 1180 kJ
    • energy required to convert to vapor 8420 kJ
    • energy required to heat to boiling point and convert to vapor 9600 kJ












  • Like I get it, they don’t want someone torrenting 100tb of data in a day. That bogs things down.

    No, that isn’t accurate and isn’t getting it.

    All the data caps today are for total cumulative quantity per billing cycle. That is not a reliable method for controlling what actually bogs things down, which is the bandwidth used at any moment (speed).

    Limiting bandwidth is also done by most ISPs today, but that’s not what this is asking to change. The data caps are exclusively a way to charge more.