OK, let’s be clear. You are pontificating based on what? Have you studied sexual medicine? Gynecology? Physiotherapy?Psychology? Do know me or my wife?

40% of women experience dyspareunia (painful intercourse), and often never realize it’s treatable, or they take long to realize. My wife’s physiotherapist had a 60-years old patient. Additionally, libido naturally varies between individuals, meaning couples with mismatched desires must both adapt.

https://www.mayoclinichealthsystem.org/hometown-health/speaking-of-health/womens-sexual-health-when-being-intimate-hurts

These physical factors are often compounded by psychological barriers, such as sexually repressive upbringings and stigma surrounding therapy. When a woman is unaware that her condition is treatable, she may deflect blame rather than seek help. Framing sexual difficulties as solely a husband’s fault only reinforces this resistance. Blame narratives prevent women from accessing the care they need.

I never said gender equality has been achieved. You are pontificating about people you never met, based on prejudice. What is your data? Mayo Clinic says 40% of women experience dyspareunia (painful intercourse), yet many don’t realize it’s a treatable medical condition. Or they take long to realize. My wife’s physiotherapist had a 60-years-old patient. Additionally, libido naturally varies between individuals, meaning couples with mismatched desires must both adapt.

These physical factors are often compounded by psychological barriers, such as sexually repressive upbringings and stigma surrounding therapy. When a woman is unaware that her condition is treatable, she may deflect blame rather than seek help. Pontificating that sexual difficulties are always the husband’s fault only reinforces this resistance. Blame narratives prevent women from accessing the care they need.

Generalization sucks.

Many assume an unsatisfied husband is simply demanding or abusive, but the reality is far more nuanced. For instance, the Mayo Clinic reports that 40% of women experience dyspareunia (painful intercourse), yet many don’t realize it’s a treatable medical condition. Or they take long to realize. My wife’s physiotherapist had a 60-years old patient. Additionally, libido naturally varies between individuals, meaning couples with mismatched desires must both adapt.

These physical factors are often compounded by psychological barriers, such as sexually repressive upbringings and stigma surrounding therapy. When a woman is unaware that her condition is treatable, she may deflect blame rather than seek help. Framing sexual difficulties as solely a husband’s fault only reinforces this resistance. Blame narratives prevent women from accessing the care they need.

Generalization sucks.

OK, thank you for reading more carefully! I am a bit emotional too.

You say that based on what? For seven years I politely asked her to have more healthy frequency, to have reasonable variation, for her to see a gynecologist about her physical problems, and to have psychotherapy for her brutal headaches as neurologist had prescribed. The psychotherapy would also benefit our marriage. I long had therapy myself and made an effort to be a good husband. After seven years I finally told her in tougher terms that our marriage was not good. The therapy has already made good benefit. The brutal headaches are gone. The fights too.

My whole point is that prejudiced people pontificate about the reality of couples they never met and know nothing about.

Masturbation is healthy.

Masturbation is inferior in every respect. Is has zero affection, it is less pleasing, less fun, less everything.

Either way I don’t believe we’re entitled to our spouse’s bodies or to sex.

OK, but do not dogmatize it. Don’t rigidly judge the particular circumstance of couples you never met. A couple gets married, both have issues, and both suffer. One consequence is that they have almost no sex, which is terrible to one with libido. Then people pontificate: the side with libido should just live their entire life without sex. And the part who lacks libido should continue to have brutal headaches twice or thrice a week, as she believes “therapy is for the weak”. In no event can the husband demand she have therapy. Dogma is everything, material reality is nothing.

It is analogous to conservative priests. Someone tells him: lifelong marriage is beautiful, but what about women who are physically abused by their husband? The priest pontificates: she must take the children to her parent’s house, then raise them without a father, and she must live without a husband for her entire life. In no event can we tolerate she have a second union, because dogma is dogma.

deleted by creator

I wrote in a haste. My depression is preexisting, but relationship problems are a contributing factor. I have then edited the original comment.

I think nowadays I do a similar amount of work as she. Some tasks she does more, others I do more. And we both have help.

Anyway, our sex problems are as old as our marriage, many years before pregnancy.

Regarding your other comment about not having a right to sex: marriage comes with an implicit spectation of sex. If someone despises sex, they need to make it clear before marriage.

I am not talking about one side being a dick and still demanding sex. I am talking about a person with clear health problems refusing treatment because therapy is for the weak and therefore she has no problem.

I am not saying she is evil, I am saying prejudiced caricatures cause troubled people to refuse therapy.

Maybe I wrote in a confusing way, but she is a much happier person now after therapy! The fights and headaches are gone. Previously, twice or thrice a week she had such violent headaches that induced small visual hallucinations, but she refused treatment because “it is normal, I was born this way”.

deleted by creator

You say that based on what? Do you know these couples’ reality? See my other post: https://lemmy.eco.br/post/22554051/20529801

deleted by creator