Basically the title

  • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    9 months ago

    Browser too, and the whole activeX, and DirectX api system to practically force windows only development.

      • Mactan@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        9 months ago

        for the millionth time they get to stand on the shoulders on all the wine development that came before it. and now we have to reckon with the bullshit of proton patches that never go upstream to make wine better for all

        • IceFoxX@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Criticism may be justified, but without Proton, how far would wine have come? Without Steamdeck + proton, gaming would still be a no-go for linux and absolutely not worth mentioning. So fewer users would have switched to linux.

          OK let go back and bring wine forward … Maybe it will be something in 10-20 years ( well for released titles and not future Titels.)

        • Soluna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          Tbf if wine were released under regular GNU instead of LGPL, Valve wouldn’t have been able to make Proton proprietary, and so their contributions would also be open source. It is unfortunate that this is the situation, but by using the LGPL license WINE basically permitted this, no?