sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agoMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.comexternal-linkmessage-square132fedilinkarrow-up11.41Karrow-down115cross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
arrow-up11.4Karrow-down1external-linkMozilla officially opposes Web Enviroment Integrity API (DRM for web pages proposal from Google)github.comsabreW4K3@lemmy.tf to Firefox@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square132fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.mltechnology@beehaw.orgtechnology@lemmy.mlfirefox@lemmy.ml
minus-squarejumperalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·1 year agowhy did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer? It’s always the profits!!!
minus-squareBrahm1nmam@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-21 year agoI get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it. Edit: site, not sight
minus-squareEranziel@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoThey’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.
minus-squarejumperalex@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoI want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING
why did you waste your time asking that question when you already knew the answer?
It’s always the profits!!!
I get it costs money to develop accessibility, but you can’t rip off a blind man if he can’t navigate your sight. I truly don’t get it.
Edit: site, not sight
They’ve simply run the numbers and decided it would cost more to support the blind man’s access than they could get from plundering the blind man.
I want to laugh but … well … I’m not crying YOU’RE CRYING