This is maybe a little paranoid but… i have a jellyfin server that i let some family members use. one of them intends to use an app for apple tv, which i think is swiftfin or something like that. i am a bit skeptical about smart-TVs and the data they phone home with, so i was wondering if there is any chance that i could be compromised due to the linux isos i host on jellyfin due to some sneaky smart-TV stuff?

  • lunsjentilanette@sh.itjust.worksOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    First: compromised how?

    I dont want to be receiving dmca letters (or similar where i live). So I mean having access to what is being played (the names of the files would be a dead giveaway).

    • Clusterfck@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Let’s be real, it’s in those companies best interest that we never know even if they are seeing that. As soon as someone got a DMCA notice because their Roku told the government they pirated Deadpool, there would be a massive amount of damage control required.

        • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Nothing wrong with asking a question, especially when you’re talking about devices that are notorious for sending every scrap of data they can gather to everywhere. (Looking at you, Roku.)

    • DigitalDilemma@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Interesting thought.

      IANAL, but I understand that most successful prosecutions have been for /distributing/ copyright material, rather than /consuming/ it. I think that’s quite a big distinction, legally, and watching a dodgy recording is less clearly illegal in many countries and may be entirely legal - even if they could prove that filename = actual file.