• walden@sub.wetshaving.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I don’t like seeing miltary spending increase, but the social/economic funding is just because there was a spike for the pandemic, right? I wouldn’t call it a fare comparison.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      4 months ago

      That doesn’t make any sense, why should social spending go down after the pandemic if there’s clearly plenty of money for it as illustrated by the military spending. Clearly, the benefits people got during the pandemic could’ve been continued and even increased going forward. Yet, instead Biden regime chose to spend funds on the military while cutting social service.

          • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s one way of seeing it. Another way might be “the years conservatives are in control in Congress are years with lower social service funding”

            • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              If you like, but because of the way the electoral system is set up they have a structural advantage that can only be overcome by economic collapse and social disruption. We never have a Democratic majority without a major disaster under Republicans.

              I guess it’s “fortunate” that every time Republicans get elected, major disaster follows.

              • originalfrozenbanana@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 months ago

                I feel like a crazy person “arguing” with you that it shouldn’t be this way but here we are, both of us presumably sobbing right now out of sheer frustration