• randomtask@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Rightly so. While the state has a right to prohibit individual actions that cause harm, such as hate speech or incitements to violence, it would be a massive human rights violation to ban access to platforms generally, as it would silence a space where constructive dissent is organized.

    • Raphael@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Liberal free speech logic, then you just need to tighten up or loosen up some screws and find the most convenient definition of “cause harm”.

      I’d say anything communism related qualifies as “cause harm”

  • freagle@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Felony authoritarianism carries with it a minimum sentence of 10 years. If convicted, Macron is likely to experience extraordinary rendition to freedom sites where he will be subjected to enhanced interrogation techniques about which Russian, Slavic, or Generic Asian, put him up to committing these heinous crimes against huge manatees.