• KᑌᔕᕼIᗩ@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is a heck of a lot of opinion in this article. GNOME itself and the direction they’ve taken has been a source of endless debate.

    I remember the time they took out the transparency options in GNOME Terminal for the same reasons used in this article. One person’s “bloat” is another persons much loved feature.

    • guyman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Gnome is mostly removing features to make maintenance easier for them. They’d rather push the narrative that there is one right way to do things and settings are unnecessary. Needless to say, this has bit them in the bum many times and will continue to do so as time goes on. Remember how adamant they were about a sidedock with no option to change it?

    • flashgnash@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean the ideal solution here is include all of those features by default and then allow users to turn them off/remove them as they please

      Personally I think pretty much everything included in gnome is pretty essential to a standard desktop experience, if you start chopping bits off and don’t have anything to replace them with you end up with a nonfunctional system as far as the average user is concerned