stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 2 years agoconsider the implications for a post scarcity futureslrpnk.netimagemessage-square468fedilinkarrow-up11.72Karrow-down172
arrow-up11.65Karrow-down1imageconsider the implications for a post scarcity futureslrpnk.netstabby_cicada@slrpnk.net to Solarpunk@slrpnk.net · 2 years agomessage-square468fedilink
minus-squareBrave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up31·2 years agoThe surplus should be returned to the sun. It’s called investing in your future.
minus-squarefreebee@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up7·2 years agoAdding a tiny bit of energy to the sun so it will have burned-up in 4bln minus 5 years instead of in 4 bln years? Genius.
minus-squareBrave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 years agoThe joke is that it wouldn’t work. God damn it lmfao
minus-squarebane_killgrind@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoYOU DON’T KNOW THAT WE’VE NEVER TRIED
minus-squareBrave Little Hitachi Wand@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·2 years agoTHAT SPEEDS UP THE RATE OF FUEL CONSUMPTION negligibly
The surplus should be returned to the sun. It’s called investing in your future.
Adding a tiny bit of energy to the sun so it will have burned-up in 4bln minus 5 years instead of in 4 bln years? Genius.
The joke is that it wouldn’t work. God damn it lmfao
YOU DON’T KNOW THAT WE’VE NEVER TRIED
THAT SPEEDS UP THE RATE OF FUEL CONSUMPTION negligibly
Not with that attitude.