• kixik@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      Jami doesn’t require a phone number, which is p2p. Xmpp (+ Omemo) doesn’t require a phone number and it’s federated… I mean, if a service is willing to rid of phone numbers, it’ll do totally without them.

    • Որբունի@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The challenge of having your device solve a nasty PoW that takes minutes would not deter most people: a timer once is better than evil captchas, phone numbers, etc. I don’t understand why they use hCaptcha and not that.

        • Որբունի@jlai.lu
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          A lot, but farming phone numbers from poor countries is also cheap and Signal sends them insanely expensive SMS. There is no perfect solution, spammers aren’t stupid. Since Signal is centralised they can enforce PoW incrementally if they get reports for spam, I still think it is way better than hCaptcha which is garbage.

    • RandoCalrandian@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      It’s the signal metadata that they want to keep associated with an identity

      They still can fulfill government requests for who is talking to who and how often

      • cjf@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        9 months ago

        Got proof for that last claim?

        I thought their sealed sender feature was meant to prevent exactly this scenario.