Today, we want to inform everyone that we have decided to defederate from
https://exploding-heads.com/ [https://exploding-heads.com/]. We understand that
defederating should always be a last resort, and individuals can certainly block
communities. However, blocking alone does not prevent potential harm to
vulnerable communities. After carefully reviewing the instance, reported posts,
and multiple comments from the community, we have concluded that exploding-heads
is not adhering to the Lemmy or Citizen Code of Conduct. Therefore, we cannot,
in good faith, continue to federate with an instance that consistently promotes
hate, racism, and bullying. Examples:
https://lemmy.world/post/577526 [https://lemmy.world/post/577526] - Community
Moderator Harassment
https://exploding-heads.com/post/92194 [https://exploding-heads.com/post/92194]
- Systemadmin Post
https://exploding-heads.com/post/90780 [https://exploding-heads.com/post/90780]
- Systemadmin Post
https://exploding-heads.com/post/91488 [https://exploding-heads.com/post/91488]
- Systemadmin Post
https://exploding-heads.com/post/93725 [https://exploding-heads.com/post/93725]
- Community Moderator Post Again, deciding to defederate from an instance is not
taken lightly. In the future, we will continue to review instances on a
case-by-case bases. As for our community, please refrain from posting or
commenting with hateful words as well. Arguing back and calling people names is
not the solution. The best course of action is to report the posts or comments
violating our server rules. Lemmy Code of Conduct
https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html
[https://join-lemmy.org/docs/code_of_conduct.html]
Citizen Code of Conduct
https://github.com/stumpsyn/policies/blob/master/citizen_code_of_conduct.md
[https://github.com/stumpsyn/policies/blob/master/citizen_code_of_conduct.md]
“We are committed to providing a friendly, safe, and welcoming environment for
all, regardless of level of experience, gender identity and expression, sexual
orientation, disability, personal appearance, body size, race, ethnicity, age,
religion, nationality, or other similar characteristic.”
Of the examples they gave I really think only Fisuxcel’s tranny faggot comment was ban worthy. And even then he’s not even a admin here and lemmy world could have just deleted his community.
I suggest in the future admin’s keep their edgy content on alt accounts and in communities that pussy instances can just block.
In this way federation may work a little better.
On the one hand, fuck lemmy world. On the other hand, instances defederating hurts everyone so I do think it is our responsibility to work with them a little bit if they can be reasonable about it.
I take full responsibility for my Biden Pedo post which was featured. Biden is a Pedo but it was animated and perhaps I could have tagged it nsfw.
no because most people are decent people who despise the kind of things that are being said here. It’s never going to be “mainstream”. It’s never going to be cool to be a hater. You’re always going to be sad little losers in your internet bubble blaming everyone and everything else
most people are decent people who despise the kind of things that are being said here
tbh I think posters are being tame here, and there are perhaps a majority of people who agree with things being posted here
the views are pretty mainstream and liked
never going to be cool to be a hater
well, the other side very much seems to hate us or our values at times so I think “hate” seems to be pretty popular, it’s just a debate about what to “hate”
sad little losers in your internet bubble
we are growing and were here before this current reddit influx, the redditors aren’t even our core / target group so I am not surprised if few have joined the instance
if a minority, there has frequently been a correct minority against an incorrect majority
Now are there specifics you would like to debate or discuss that you disagree with? Might be good for another post if so. I think a lot of posters are willing to be accommodating to opposite views and to find possible bipartisan solutions to problems.
For example, abortion takes an innocent life so should be criminalized (something perhaps you disagree with?) but there has been a proposed solution of “evacuationism” which would allow a pregnancy to be transferred to another womb. We could also talk about making adoption services more accessible. These would be solutions that would make the issue less burdensome to those who may not agree with the policy that seems to be correct on this topic.
I really wish there was a shitposting instance completely free of censorship other than anything that breaks the law.
same hopefully there will be eventually I’m sure lots of people would like it
no because most people are decent people who despise the kind of things that are being said here. It’s never going to be “mainstream”. It’s never going to be cool to be a hater. You’re always going to be sad little losers in your internet bubble blaming everyone and everything else
tbh I think posters are being tame here, and there are perhaps a majority of people who agree with things being posted here
the views are pretty mainstream and liked
well, the other side very much seems to hate us or our values at times so I think “hate” seems to be pretty popular, it’s just a debate about what to “hate”
we are growing and were here before this current reddit influx, the redditors aren’t even our core / target group so I am not surprised if few have joined the instance
if a minority, there has frequently been a correct minority against an incorrect majority
Now are there specifics you would like to debate or discuss that you disagree with? Might be good for another post if so. I think a lot of posters are willing to be accommodating to opposite views and to find possible bipartisan solutions to problems.
For example, abortion takes an innocent life so should be criminalized (something perhaps you disagree with?) but there has been a proposed solution of “evacuationism” which would allow a pregnancy to be transferred to another womb. We could also talk about making adoption services more accessible. These would be solutions that would make the issue less burdensome to those who may not agree with the policy that seems to be correct on this topic.