Have you actually read the link you posted? It is a long list of drivel with claims that fails to link to any of the resulting reports or news articles.

• The fact that news organizations visited and continue to write articles about the genocide is what? proof they are also CIA assets?
• Same as the fact countries keep repeating the claims is just geopolitics?
• A pillar of the arguments made against Uyghur genocide is that the Uyghur population grew in the last decade. This argument is dismissed when applied to Palestinians… so which is it?

Most links in the ProleWiki article are links to qiaocollective, who then have “articles” with link collections to other un-authoritative sources. Once I reach the 3rd click-through and it fails to provide actual source material it’s game over.

Maybe what is most telling is that you link to wikipedia to discredit someone you do not like, but then need to link to prolewiki for the arguement you are trying to make. Here is the wiki article on the Uyghur genocide.

Here is the report by the Uyghur tribunal, written under the lead of the man that also tried Milosevic:

• https://uyghurtribunal.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/UT_Judgment_E-PDF_activelinks_20Feb2023_FINAL.pdf
• https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cdp-2022-0009/

The Judgement summary:

Beyond reasonable doubt the People’s Republic of China committed torture and crimes against humanity against the Uyghurs and, by the imposition of measures to prevent births intended to destroy a significant part of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang as such, committed genocide. 9th of December 2021