kurumin@linux.community to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agoLazarus hackers now push Linux malware via fake job offerswww.bleepingcomputer.comexternal-linkmessage-square41fedilinkarrow-up1187arrow-down14cross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyz
arrow-up1183arrow-down1external-linkLazarus hackers now push Linux malware via fake job offerswww.bleepingcomputer.comkurumin@linux.community to Linux@lemmy.mlEnglish · 2 years agomessage-square41fedilinkcross-posted to: linux@sopuli.xyz
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-22 years agoZip too? I thought only on Windows, while tar retains unix permissions.
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoAll archive formats do it, afaik.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 years agoBut i’m sure there was an issue somewhile ago, because zip only preserves Windows permissions…
minus-squareRustmilian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·edit-22 years agoThere’s a bunch of zip implementations(Info-Zip, Gzip, 7-Zip, PKZip, Pigz, etc.), so perhaps an older version of one of the implementations didn’t support preserving the Linux executable permission in the past.
Zip too? I thought only on Windows, while tar retains unix permissions.
All archive formats do it, afaik.
But i’m sure there was an issue somewhile ago, because zip only preserves Windows permissions…
There’s a bunch of zip implementations(Info-Zip, Gzip, 7-Zip, PKZip, Pigz, etc.), so perhaps an older version of one of the implementations didn’t support preserving the Linux executable permission in the past.