• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    10 hours ago

    These are large drones that fly too high to hit with a shotgun. also laser is by far the cheapest option because it just takes electricity to operate.

    • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Lasers massively lose efficiency over distance because the light spreads with distance. They’re horrible for long range targeting.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        They are using them right now, so clearly not that terrible for this use case. Even when you have loss of efficiency, if you’re hooked up to the power grid, you can amplify the power enough for it to be effective. And it’s going to be cheaper than producing interceptor missiles and drones that have to be physically produced, stored, and distributed.

    • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I have a serious doubt that whatever Russia could cobble together would be an effective laser weapon for more than just demo.

        • Zedd_Prophecy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          No it’s more like Russias piss poor attempt at making their very own gps system while having none of the benefits of the USSR … 32 satellites launched so far. One lost … 4 or 5 in orbits so low as to be detrimental, not one so far has reached the target 800km goal . Second launches are dispersed in various geostationary orbits and completely varied. They needed a net to get geo location and they cats pebbles in the pond. There are ramifications to dumbing down the country.