• Tiresia@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    The point is also that this is the pre-enshittification version of AI, and any person or system foolish enough to become dependent on it will get exploited to the best of AI companies’ abilities.

    • BJW@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Yeah, my laptop is totally going to exploit me. I better not get hooked on using it. I’ll just leave it packed up in the box if came in, unplugged from the wall, so it doesn’t get a chance. /s

    • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      17 hours ago

      If only there were some community of people who valued using free and open source software so we had options that were not dependent on the whims of companies. Then we could have software that we could depend on that isn’t dependent on the whims of corporations.

      Throwing out AI because there are AI companies who causing harm is like giving up on Operating Systems because of the plethora of bad acts made by Microsoft.

      I agree that everyone should avoid using OpenAI, Anthropic or any of the other companies which were created to spend trillions of dollars buying up all computer hardware on the planet while building fossil fueled datacenters.

      That isn’t the same as thinking that the actual machine learning technology itself is somehow inherently bad. There are many open weight models and FOSS projects that lets people use AI without contributing to the capitalist orgy that’s causing all of the secondary harms.

      People conflating AI technology and AI companies are failing to diagnose the issue that we’re facing.

      • diaphragmwp@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        6 hours ago

        Open weight != open source.

        You can can inspect open source software. You can compile the source into binary. You cannot inspect open binary. Well, you can, but it’s difficult. Can anyone ever inspect the fucking weights in a useful way? They are just bias numbers.

      • BJW@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Exactly! Well said. So many idiots here who think that AI=data center.

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        And all those AI models where made by requiring these companies and their data centers and their millions of dollars.

        • BJW@lemmus.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          And all the cars were made requiring companies with their factories and their millions of dollars. And all the computers. And all the… Everything! WTF is your point?

    • halezinflames@lemmus.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      pre-enshittification?

      Then what the hell are the models Windows is relying on if this is the GOOD stuff?

      • anewfox@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        20 hours ago

        the opposite of “enshittified” isn’t “good.” some stuff sucks for fresh, new reasons before it enshittifies and turns to full on exploitative rent-seeking.

        for example, anthropic quietly pulled claude code from their pro subscriptions and made it a separate subscription. that’s enshittification. and stupid AI bros are gonna fall for it every time.