• Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    60 minutes ago

    Revolutionary action is action that advances the revolutionary struggle. A random individual acting alone is not advancing the revololutionary struggle.

    • someoneelse@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      53 minutes ago

      Even if it is the same action that a revolutionary committee would dictate?

      And please define what you mean by revolutionary struggle. I don’t want to make assumptions.

      • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 minutes ago

        You are trying to make the argument that the group planning doesn’t matter, the action does. I am telling you that assassination can only ever be revolutionary if it fits in the context of a revolutionary movement, and isn’t just sporadic violence. Lenin went over this a century ago and it’s still nearly the same.

        • someoneelse@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 minutes ago

          I am not making that argument at all. I saying that until action has taken place that effects a reaction, everything until that point is not revolutionary action. I never said it doesn’t matter, or that it isn’t necessary, just that making your backpack for a hike is not hiking, as necessary as it might be.

          The second part, which you keep dodging is that any action “fitting the context of a revolutionary movement” can be labeled revolutionary even if carried out by a person outside of a revolutionary organization.

          This is why I tried, unsuccessfully, to get you to define your words.