Seventy-seven percent of middle-age Americans (35-54 years old) say they want to return to a time before society was “plugged in,” meaning a time before there was widespread internet and cell phone usage. As told by a new Harris Poll (via Fast Company), 63% of younger folks (18-34 years old) were also keen on returning to a pre-plugged-in world, despite that being a world they largely never had a chance to occupy.

  • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    2 years ago

    I have trying to find the poll by following link and found nothing but this.

    According to a new Harris Poll shared exclusively with Fast Company

    So there is no actual source, no ways to check if the poll actually exist or not, no way to check if poll’s question phrased in a way to get certain response, how many actually responded to the poll, etc. And, compare to most big news published poll result, a confidence and margin of error.

    There for, I simply view this as click bait article to generate engagement, which it did.

      • PenguinTD@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        I think the % is much higher cause even I sometimes say stuff like “I believe like 80% of my post is about games”. But the reality is that I never actually tried to count it.

    • shanghaibebop@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 years ago

      It’s exactly counter to established research that places huge values on internet enables services.

      https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-much-are-search-engines-worth-to-you

      18k per year valued for search engines, 9k a year for email and 4K a year for maps.

      Of course framing might be slightly different, but getting people to saying thing is very different than getting people to put money where their mouth is. I would much rather trust the dollar signal, especially in the US.

  • patchymoose@rammy.site
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t think people actually would, if push came to shove. They’re just expressing nostalgia for a simpler time, which is pretty easy to understand, given all the dystopian effects of social media and smartphones.

    I think smartphones have done a lot of harm, but they’ve still done far more good, which is why we use them. Especially in poorer countries where smartphones are often people’s only access to the internet.

    That said, there’s nothing stopping any of these people in the article from being the change they want to see in the world. Not to send anybody to Reddit, but r/dumbphones is a fast growing subreddit for people that want to try that. A lot of the users are Gen Z who never got to try them and want to give it a whirl.

    • shanghaibebop@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      Yeah, I think people forgot how terrible it was before email, gps, and etc.

      Remember having to find the yellow book to call a plumber only to not get anything after trying 5 numbers? Oh wait, you don’t know how bad they’ll be because there are no online reviews. Memos from your boss via sticky notes? Faxing shit over and over again?

      I mean, this study says it all, people need to be paid almost 20k to not use any online search for a year, almost 9k to not use email in a year. These services provide huge value for us in our daily lives. https://mitsloan.mit.edu/ideas-made-to-matter/how-much-are-search-engines-worth-to-you

    • vacuumflower@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is a chicken and egg problem, today’s Web is so horrible exactly because most of the boors in it treat it with disgust from the very first moment and try to avoid choices, thus make the worst choices possible.

      I mean, it’s a golden rule - if you don’t know what to do, do something. They don’t out of fear, just consume what they are being given, which is the very thing they should fear.

  • heartlessevil@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    If you are longing for a world that you never lived in, there’s probably some “grass is greener on the other side” in play. The world before smart phones was considerably worse. I bet that most of the people who are asking for this don’t know how to read a paper map and have never seen a phone book. They aren’t considering getting lost or into a car accident and needing to find the nearest house to ask a stranger to call emergency services on their land line.

    The good news is that, if you don’t want to use a smart phone, you can just… not. Nobody is forcing you. If you really wanted a world without smart phones you would already not be using one!

    • Doom_Cough@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      2 years ago

      That’s not entirely true. I have twice in the last year had no other option than to install an app to use tickets I purchased. An many medical services refuse to do anything that isn’t online or via an app. It’s getting to be harder and harder to not need a mobile device. It’s getting pretty stupid. Theine has been crossed already. I lived half my life without internet, I’d survive without it. But the world isn’t headed in a direction that makes it feesible anymore unless you just completely check out.

      • LostCause@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        A lot of banks here around me are closing cause they want people to use the online banking only, customer service barely existed in a long time now already anyway, but specifically for the TAN you need an app and thus smartphone. Not an issue for me personally as I‘m tied to all this through my job anyway, but for old people and technologically illiterate people it must feel pretty dystopian.

    • CarolinaBlues@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      If you are longing for a world that you never lived in

      Middle aged Americans definitely remember a time before everyone was online all the time. It’s not dreaming of some hypothetical unknown Camelot, it’s remembering a time when people actually showed up for their dinner plans with you because they couldn’t simply text to flake out when you were already seated.

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Nobody is forcing you.

      That is not really true, I mean depending on your definition of “forcing”. Okay, it’s true, nobody is holding a gun to your head.

      But depending on where you live, it may be impossible to use a taxi. It would be impossible to work at a lot of workplaces. I work at a university where thankfully faculty are not required to own a smartphone, but students are (if you do not check in for attendance with the university’s app, you automatically fail the course). Soon here it might be impossible to have a bank account without a smartphone app. Any event that requires tickets, forget about it. We’re also getting closer to it being a requirement to see a doctor (some doctor’s offices here already do not allow any patients that haven’t installed their app, and the number is growing).

      There’s a lot of soft pressure, too. The supermarket by us doesn’t require you to install their app. You can pay cash without a smartphone…if you’re willing to pay 2x the usual amount for groceries (which are already quite expensive).

    • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I found your comment posting at the same time as mine with the same thesis (complete with “can just …”) pretty funny.

  • tiredofsametab@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    As someone who is Gen X or millennial depending upon the day and the years they pick, I don’t want this. It’s very easy to look back through rose-tinted glasses, but there are a lot of things, which many commenters already touched on, that were much harder or worse then. One that I didn’t see early was maps and navigation. I had to lug around a giant atlas and plan out my routes to get somewhere. If there were a new street or development or something, I was SOL. Even in the early days, printing out MapQuest maps was far better, but still had its own issues. Aside from that, many other commenters mention many of the things that were decidedly worse or more inconvenient back then.

    • cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Oof yeah even that awkward period where online maps were a thing but mobile internet wasn’t quite there yet (at least here in NZ) sucked, got a lot of “fond” memories of printing out gmaps screenshots in order to give my parents directions! Wasn’t quite as bad as traditional fold-out paper maps but still nowhere near as easy and convenient as it is nowadays.

  • Digital Mark@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    Seems reasonable to me. I’m in the upper end of that range, center GenX (yes I know you don’t remember us). I vary between wanting it to be 1970-2000. 1990 was nice, good industrial music, many of the old blues musicians were still alive & playing, computers were still fun, BBS’s, the early non-shitty Internet, pagers and car phones if you wanted to be reachable that much, but you could just NOT be. Go out for cigarettes and never come back.

    Anyone who thinks this panopticon hellscape we live in is better, is nuts.

    • psudo@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      I can’t help but feel like a lot of the “the internet was better back in the day” is rose colored glasses. Things were just as fragmented, but were even less welcoming to our groups, there was more questionable content that people were trying to trick you into viewing. It definitely wasn’t all bad, but it feels like it’s coming from the same impulse as every other “things were better back in my day.”

      • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 years ago

        A key difference is that nothing was being shoved at you as soon as you got up from the computer.

        • psudo@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 years ago

          You can always put your phone down. I also get the pressure to return a text/dm right away, but as far as I can tell no one that I actually want to talk to expects that immediate response.

          • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 years ago

            That was a key thing to finally learn. I’d removed all the people who expected I was on call for them from my life for other reasons, which wasn’t an easy process, so everyone left is a reasonable person who texts for non-business reasons with a 1-2 day response expectation, though it’s usually much faster. If it’s more important, it’s a phone call. If they just want to chat, they text to see if I’m available before calling.

            I set my phone to not ring unless the number’s in my contacts. If someone needs to get a hold of me, they can leave a message … but never do. I get notifications for weather alerts, text messages, my transit app and when a new xkcd gets posted. I certainly check my email and other apps on occasion, but I don’t need notifications.

            Other than surrounding yourself with the right people, the whole thing takes minutes once you’ve hit that mindset.

    • SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      How much did a computer cost back then? How much were the first graphics cards? How compatible were computers with each other? How much did one album cost on CD? How easy was it to obtain information on a problem? How easy was it to price compare things between stores?

      The issue is social media and allowing everyone to voice their immediate thoughts on things in pseudo anonymity. It’s also the tendency of people to look at people’s fake persona and then compare themselves to it. I could rent a Lambo for the weekend and use a filter like I’m actually fit and still have hair and make all my former classmates insecure because they never see me in person. That’s the shit everyone wants to go away, they don’t want to give up Spotify.

  • shikitohno@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 years ago

    I don’t want to go back to a world without the internet or cell phones, but I would like expectations to change. Just because you can theoretically reach me at any time doesn’t mean I’m obligated to respond to you or acknowledge you at any time. Whether it’s work or personal acquaintances, I can’t stand it when it’s treated like a horribly rude thing to not immediately acknowledge and respond to any communication, no matter how trivial. A lot of times, I’m busy working on my own thing and don’t want to kick off twenty minutes of back and forth texting over some trivial thing that’s going to distract me from what I’m doing.

  • corytheboyd@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    On one hand, shut it all down. We tried, it irreversibly melted the brains of billions.

    On the other hand, mega rose tinted glasses. It wasn’t greener days for folks being systematically oppressed, as there was no concept of democratic news sources run by people.

    Compromise: shit’s fucked, can’t change that. can control my own internet hygiene to avoid the doom bullshit, will do that.

  • ajbin@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    2 years ago

    As a baby GenX-er smartphones, and always-on internet didn’t come into my life until I was at university so I straddle both worlds, and I definitely would not go back. What I have done in recent years is revolt against the always-on side of modern tech. My phone makes not a peep of sound or vibration, it shows no notifications unless I look in the tray, all app badges are turned off. I can’t tell you how much this has improved my life!

    I even went so far to run my phone in black and white for 6 months as an experiment. That was a real interesting experience! I found it way easier to simply read and then put down my phone. When I finished my stint and turned colour back on I actually felt dizzy using the phone for a few days.

    When you look at how Kbin/Lemmy has exploded in a just a few short days it’s clear that modern tech can be amazing for humanity in terms of creating communities and bringing people together, but how we do it in terms of app designs, notifications, dark patterns and all the hullabaloo of is somehow anti-human and I think with waves hands all that has befallen us in the past couple of years we are suddenly waking up and trying to find new ways to be people with tech.

    Let’s hope the fediverse is a good step in that new direction.

    • greenskye@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      This. I think people are equating the current capitalistic hellhole the internet has become with the much more reasonable approach society took pre-internet. The tools and capability are good, the uses they’re being used for currently are not.

  • FurtiveFugitive@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 years ago

    I feel like, for the 35-54 bracket at least, this must be less about giving up all the modern conveniences we have today but more about wishing they could raise their children in that simpler time. You don’t want your kids to be left out of what’s new and cool but you also don’t want them exposed to EVERYTHING these platforms bring. It’s a tight rope to walk and I’m not looking forward to it when my kids are older. I know a lot of people who have gone down the road of, “I didn’t have a cell phone growing up, my kids won’t either.” But it’s not very realistic in today’s world.

    • duncesplayed@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree with your assessment. I have a lot to say about this, and I’m glad to have found this article, as I’ve been having some serious inner turmoil about this lately, and this makes me feel a bit like I’m not totally alone or crazy. (But also I can’t find a link to the original survey, which makes it hard to trust, as I can’t find any description of the methodology or the exact wording of the questions)

      I’m an older Millenial (sometimes consider Gen X, depending on the terminology used) with young kids. It’s true that I would rather have them brought up 30 years ago than today. Sometimes when I see posts about parents letting their young kids (like let’s say 10) have their own smartphone and then complain about, people get snarky like “You’re the parent. If you don’t like it, just take their smartphone away.”

      But it is a tightrope to walk. I don’t want them expose them something like Instagram, which gives them eating disorders, depression, anxiety, chips away at their sense of privacy, etc. But I also don’t want them to be “the weird kid” who can’t relate to any of their peers. When I was growing up, I remember "the weird kid"s who weren’t allowed to watch TV, weren’t to play video games, etc. I can recognize that in many ways they probably benefited from not sitting in front of the TV for hours each day, but I can also recognize they probably didn’t benefit from not being able to talk to any of the rest of us about the latest episode of Fresh Prince. I do see it as a balancing act between teaching them that there’s a lot about their generation that sucks, but also letting them experience enough of it to see for themselves, and relate to the other kids around them.

  • Zagaroth@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Been there, done that, and fuck no.

    But I also have no problems with leaving my phone on Do Not Disturb and reading a book. I am happy to ignore the world. I don’t let connectedness rule me. I use it.

    Usually. I also have ADHD, so sometimes I just need my stimulation

  • Powderhorn@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Not a lot of meat to the story, and it conflates tech itself with the social expectations that have sprung up because of it and the way it’s used. “Instagram’s pedophile network” (which seems only to be brought up for shock value) is not “cell service.”

    I’d hazard a guess that what respondents really want to return to not being expected to be available to anyone at any time. And, crucially, they don’t feel they can just … do that.

    • norb@lemmy.norbz.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’d hazard a guess that what respondents really want to return to not being expected to be available to anyone at any time. And, crucially, they don’t feel they can just … do that.

      I think you hit the nail on the head here. People want to go back to a time when it wasn’t possible, but I think even more importantly where it wasn’t expected, that you are available 24/7/365.

      The good thing is we can, as a society, start to not expect that availability.

    • Shift_@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      This is the heart of the issue. People don’t feel like they are allowed to take time to themselves. In reality all it takes is not answering the messages if you don’t feel like it. Hell, you don’t even have to look at them.

  • Jeze3D.exe v0.0.7@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    2 years ago

    Yes, take me back. People are horribly addicted to social media and especially their smartphones. It’s resulted in a dramatic increase in mental illness and desocialization.

      • cnnrduncan@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 years ago

        Man I agree with wanting less constant connectivity but I think a lot of people have a rather rose-tinted view of that time period. In most of the world it wasn’t exactly the best of times for people who fell outside of certain societal norms - trans folk were mostly thought of as punchlines to jokes, being gay was a common insult, beating up people for being their genuine selves was still pretty common, and so on.

  • jprjr@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    I think what people are really missing is being able to feel disconnected.

    Like it used to be you’d send an email and you’d get a response tomorrow. Because people would go online occasionally.

    Now if I’m not responding to a text within a few minutes people get upset. You’ll see people answer the phone during a movie to say “hey I’m in a movie I’ll call you back”

    I’d like to go back to the world of being connected but having a slight delay is ok

    • Shift_@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      Anyone I talk to regularly, would not care if I didn’t answer their texts for a few days. My phone is always on vibrate or silent. I engage with people only as much as I want to.

      What I’m saying is all that stuff can be changed if you want it to.

    • skogens_ro@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 years ago

      But that’s okay today? At least in my social circles it is. Just talk about it to whichever friend you have that demands you answer immediately. They are being unreasonable.

      • jprjr@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean my version of “a few minutes” is like an hour. Like it used to be you could respond to a text way later in the day or even the next, and that acceptable amount of time is getting shorter and shorter.

  • density@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 years ago

    Or you just stood around waiting for a person for 2 hours with no way to learn if they were running late or blowing you off or dead.

    • lavender dreams@waveform.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Honestly, people committed to plans in a way they don’t now. I rarely had last minute cancellations when I was younger. Time might have been cut short or something, but people showed up. Changes of plans happened well in advance. Occasionally, I got stood up, but it was rare.

      Now, I’d say probably 20-30% of the time, plans get changed last minute or more rarely, somebody bails.

      Otherwise, yeah, having a mobile computer/phone in my pocket is indispensable and I’d never fully give it up.

      • SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        My family is like this and my wife still does not understand it. We make plans, they are the plans until they change.

        “Did you call your mom and see if we’re still going?” Why would I do that? We made the plans. If we say we’re all meeting at the grand canyon at noon on September 1st 2037 then we’ll be there, those are the plans.

      • density@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I mean it is a pretty brief time period to be nostalgic over. In USA, any cellphone ownership passed 80% in 2010. That is an overall number. Depending on who and where you are it might have been before or after. I think 80% is “widespread”. Smartphones passed 80% in 2019. So you are talking about 9 years.

        Source: pew Mobile phone ownership over time

        Tbh i do not know if relevant to making/breaking plans because my experience was that as soon as both parties have any kind of mobile device, plans started being more fragile. Not sure if smart/dumb has any impact. Maybe i misunderstood your point…

  • Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 years ago

    I am 26 and I dont want to return. I grew up before the internet getting dial up when i was about eight. The problem isnt the internet its biliondollar services that make their money through getting as much attention as humanly possible.

    • Onii-Chan@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 years ago

      I agree mostly with this take. There are aspects from that time I’d like to return to, but for the most part, this poll comes across as far too simplified. I do however, think that social media was a massive mistake and has played a major role in the increased division, hostility and hyperpolitical landscape the world now finds itself in, and I’m not sure how we come back from it. I do believe we are far too connected these days, but it isn’t a simple issue.

      I personally believe the centralization of social media and the internet in general will be seen as one of the world’s biggest mistakes in the not too distant future, especially once its (already quite apparent) impact on the mental health of the younger generations becomes widely-accepted and acknowledged. I truly wish for an early-00’s internet landscape again, but I know this will never happen.

      • vacuumflower@vlemmy.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        Well, at least after this crisis ends with some decentralized solution (I hope for Locutus despite its authors’ communicative problems), we’ll leave such mistakes in the past for like 50 years, or so I hope.

    • vacuumflower@vlemmy.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 years ago

      Same age here. However the problem is not only that, but also our (as in “people enthusiastic and understanding of it”) failure to communicate to “normies” (yes, it’s a derogatory term, but a deserved one) what the Web is and how it should function, and what are the threats.

      I’m very optimistic about Locutus (Freenet 2023), looks quite similar to things I dreamed about for a long time, only this time it’s real. Imagine dreaming about spaceships and then seeing one built for the same general goal, but for bloody real.

      It may really be a changing point (provided it doesn’t get banned and regulated, which is unironically a risk ; remember how BTC ban was being considered in many countries until it became clear that it doesn’t have the potential to be a daily currency due to well-known downsides).