• hOrni@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    39
    ·
    2 days ago

    That’s how it is stated in civilized countries. This is American bullshit. You wouldn’t get a serving size on something like oil either.

      • Buffalox@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        No it’s not, oil does not have a “serving size”.
        Thorry wrote both would be required, but when there is no “serving size” it would only be the 100g stated on the label.
        Generally here (Denmark) we never see “serving size” because it’s bullshit, and probably considered misleading.
        And misleading labeling and marketing is illegal.

        • CompactFlax@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 day ago

          There is a point to having both - or at least giving an idea of how much an item typically weighs. One cookie might be 200g or 50g; people may typically reach for 1-5 cookies, for example.

          A misleading serving size (eg “per 1/4 cookie”) is indeed not helpful at all, but I don’t think it’s illegal.

          • wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            So many single-use packets which barely contain enough for half a meal, yet say “contains 2 servings” so they can halve all the numbers on the nutrition label. Yes, this is in america.

            • anomnom@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              They had to stop doing this for drinks (at least). They now show the whole bottle contents and sometimes also servings for some sizes.

            • athatet@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              I don’t think a serving is supposed to be a meal. Pretty sure it’s talking about like, the food pyramid. It’s not a thing anymore but you gotta get a certain amount of grains and fruit and veg and dairy and you count the amounts by serving size.

            • arrow74@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Okay, but let’s say you have 35g of sauce. It’s labeled as 2 servings that equal x calories. Easy math to figure out what you ate.

              When 100g is x calories and you have to do the math it’s a bit more annoying. Even worse when you have to break out the scale.